Answer:
Here answer to the first fill in the blank is money paid and answer for the second fill in the blank is overall sacrifice.
Explanation:
Here Eddie has perceived price as money paid for the purchase of his favorite beverage, he is ready to drive 30 miles for this beverage , just because he is saving a dollar on it, so from the Eddie's point view , driving 30 miles to get the beverage is worth it . But as per the most of the customers , Eddie is making an overall sacrifice by driving 30 miles to get the beverage , just because he is saving dollar on it, so from the most customers point of view , driving 30 miles is not worth it and a lot of sacrifice is being made.
Answer:
own their own accounting business
When Heinz introduced EZ Squirt packaging and new colors such as Blastin' Green and Awesome Orange to revitalize consumer buying, the company was modifying the distribution.
Heinz has launched a color ketchup product for toddlers called EZ Squirt. The product was available in compressible containers and was eventually discontinued by him in 2006.
After six years of creatively decorating food, the novelty wore off and a young fan of the whimsical Heinz grew tired of tattooing hot dogs with his tribal tattoos. The company has discontinued the EZ Squirt color due to declining sales.
Squeeze Bottles became so popular that Heinz eventually stopped making glass bottles, until 2011 when he released a limited edition bottle with his original label.
Learn more about distribution here: brainly.com/question/12892403
#SPJ4
Answer: A. costs of moderate inflation are nearly zero whereas high inflation is quite costly.
Explanation:
Economists generally believe that moderate inflation is actually good for the economy as prices need to increase in a healthy manner overtime in order to drive consumption. This means that to them, the cost of moderate inflation is nearly zero.
This is a sharp contrast to high inflation which most economists generally believe to be costly as it reduces the savings of people as well as their real wages and welfare.
Answer:
Jill cannot hold the manufacturer responsible for her injury.
Explanation:
The above question is incomplete as there are several answer options which are listed below;
• Jill can hold the manufacturer liable for her injury as long as Lexi was in the room when she got
• Jill can hold the manufacturer liable for her injury
• Jill cannot hold the manufacturer responsible for her injury
• Lexi can hold the manufacturer liable for Jill's injury.
The above answer - Jill cannot hold the manufacturer responsible for her injury, is true according to the rule of privity of contract. The rule states that a person who is not a party to a contract does not have right to sue or be sued and to enforce the obligations arising from the contract, unlike a person who is a party to the contract.
With regards to the above scenario, Lexi, who buys a food processor is the party to the contract here, hence can sue and be sued in case of any injury suffered by her, however, Jill whom food processor was loaned to, is the third party here, hence not covered by the rule of privity of contract.
