Answer:
B
Explanation:
Corporate code of ethics is defined as a set of laid down rules and regulation that is meant to inform and guides the workers towards professionally conducting themselves in a way that aligns with the mission and core values of the organization .
However , having a code of ethical conduct in place in an organization does not mean compliance , until necessary measures for compliance are put in place. Therefore it is possible to have the code of ethics with minimum or no compliance to it. Based on this , it can sometimes be viewed as thinly disguised attempts to mislead the public into thinking that the company behaves ethically.
Answer:d. What do you think about the new ice-cream flavor
Explanation:
An open ended question is a statement that requires a response. The response can't be yes/ no or a static response
The question What do you think about the new ice-cream flavor can't be answered with yes or no. The answer can either be I like the ice cream flavour or I don't like the ice cream flavour.
I hope my answer helps you
Answer:
=> fraction of the portfolio that should be allocated to T-bills = 0.4482 = 44.82%.
=> fraction to equity = 0.5518 = 55.18%.
Explanation:
So, in this question or problem we are given the following parameters or data or information which are; that the utility function is U = E(r) – 0.5 × Aσ2 and the risk-aversion coefficient is A = 4.4.
The fraction of the portfolio that should be allocated to T-bills and its equivalent fraction to equity can be calculated by using the formula below;
The first step is to determine or Calculate the value of fraction to equity.
Hence, the fraction to equity = risk premium/(market standard deviation)^2 - risk aversion.
= 8.10% ÷ [(20.48%)^2 × 3.5 = 0.5518.
Therefore, the value for fraction of the portfolio that should be allocated to T-bills = 1 - fraction to equity = 1 - 0.5518 =0.4482 .
Answer: d. No, a contract has not been formed, since Harry has not signed a contract for the goods.
Explanation:
The Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) utilizes the Statute of Frauds which states that contracts for goods worth over $500 in value are to be signed for them to be valid.
The goods here are worth:
= 1,200 * 2
= $2,400
This contract is well worth over the $500 required for the contract to be signed which means that as Harry did not sign the contract, there is no contract.
