In the passage Brutus claim to Cassius that is he going to be able to see thing that are not there and Cassius replies that he will work as a mirror for him and help him to see the things he don’t see and support that he is honest and trustworthy telling Brutus several bad behavior that would make him doubt of Cassius and finish saying “then hold me dangerous” meaning that if Brutus see Cassius doing that things, only then he could think that Cassius is dangerous.
Hughes developed a(n)derisive tone in “salvation”
They must not base their conclusions on a.opinions
I think the author does not present adequate evidence to support his argument. This is because all he wrote was a scenarios that he can envision given the circumstances. There are no accurate data given like statistics, transcriptions, or even bills or laws that supports his views. All I can glean is that these are suppositions that may or may not be true given the circumstances it is presented with.