Answer:
<em>The interest groups on the first Amendment allowed people to assemble together to speak their opinions and rights.</em>
<em>In 1971 the Federal Election Campaign Act was passed, setting limits on how people donate money in public disclosure of campaign.</em>
Explanation:
<em>People or individual would concur with me that interest groups under the Constitution have their right to encourage a particular point of view. What most people do not agree at some point, however, this is the level that some interest group influence activities preserved under the First constitution,
</em>
<em>
In addition to rights of free speech the First constitution allows people the right to come together. for example pluralists states that assembling in groups is normal and that people will tend to move toward others with same views</em>
<em>As of today, the debate about interest groups often circulates around whether the First Amendment shields the rights of groups and individuals to lend money, and if government can control the use of this money. </em>
<em>In 1971, the Federal Election Campaign Act was passed, setting limits on how much money presidential and vice-presidential candidates and their families could provide for their own campaigns.it also made unions and cooperation's to form PACs and expected public disclosure of campaign donations and their sources. </em>
<em>In 1 the year 1974, the act was modified in a way to control the amount of money used on congressional campaigns. </em>
Answer:
Someday you'll find yourself, and will you be disappointed
Explanation:
1- The correct answer is A. Samuel Houston was the Texan leader who most supported the annexation to the United States. In fact, he was President of the Republic of Texas twice, and from his position he always fought for annexation, unlike others like Mirabeau Lamar. In addition, it is stated that Houston went to Texas sent by President Andrew Jackson to achieve annexation.
2- Houston argued that the annexation had to be carried out to respect the will and right of the Texan people (which were made up of American settlers) to decide the legal status of their territory. This argument is related to the right of self-determination of peoples, which I consider valid since it's theb population who has the power to decide on their future and that of the territory they inhabit and administer, not being the states able to make decisions contrary to the people and their will.
<h2>hey</h2>
politicak machine granted favour in exchange for voters.
Answer:
The War on Terror, also known as the Global War on Terrorism and U.S. War on Terror, is an ongoing international military campaign launched by the United States government following the September 11 attack. The war costed 2.4 trillion dollars by 2017, and thus was not worth it in my opinion.
mark me brainliestt :))
