What helped turn world war I into a global war?

1 answer:

8 0

World War I became a global conflict for several reasons. One reason was that many countries around the war were involved in some way with the war. The alliance system helped spread the war quickly. The two main alliances during the war were the Allied Powers and the Central Powers. While the emphasis is given to the main powers in each alliance, there were smaller countries allied with each side.
hope this helps!

You might be interested in

Is this statement true or false?

Svet_ta [14]

Hey!

------------------------------------------------

$\Large\boxed{\mathsf{True}}$

Sülleyman the magnificent was known for being a respected sultan of the Ottoman Empire. He was also known for ruling the longest. He is known as "the magnificent" because he led this huge empire to a time of reformation and religious prosecution.

------------------------------------------------

Hope This Helped! Good Luck!

4 0

3 years ago

The president's commission on law enforcement and the administration of justice found that ______ was the largest source of reve

pishuonlain [190]

I think the answer is gambling

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

QUESTION: How does having written rules about how Congress

topjm [15]

Explanation:

Becuse when someone says to the country that this is your country rules then on first day everyone will apply the rules but as the time passe pupils will be careless thats why tha laws are written in a book That is called The Book Of Law

8 0

3 years ago

How many years do you have to go to school to be a respiratory technician?

Natali [406]

If you want to be an associate technician, you need to have a 2-year associate degree or a 4-year bachelors degree

4 0

3 years ago

Washington said we can't have “national morality" without "religious principles." Do you agree with him? Explain

sleet_krkn [62]

Answer:

In “The Farewell Address,” George Washington describes religion and morality as the two indispensable pillars which support political prosperity. He then says that we should be cautious about the idea that morality can flourish without religion and concludes with the assertion:

"Whatever may be conceded to the influence of refined education on minds of peculiar structure, reason and experience both forbid us to expect that national morality can prevail in exclusion of religious principle."

There is considerable debate about the religious opinions of the founding fathers, including Washington. Whether he meant it or not, however, this statement is clearly false. There is no clear correlation between religious principles and national morality, let alone any good evidence that one causes the other. This would have been less clear two hundred years ago, since practically every nation had an established church, from which it was often difficult for many people to dissent publicly. Nonetheless, it is now clear that secular nations such as Sweden, Norway, Denmark, and Belgium are sustained by a national morality at least as strong as any religious nation. These countries have low rates of crime and particularly of violent crime. They have enlightened, compassionate social policies which enjoy the support of the majority of citizens. Their presses are freer and their political systems less corrupt than the average in Europe, let alone worldwide. They conform in every material respect to the founding fathers’ notion of political prosperity.

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers