1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
VashaNatasha [74]
3 years ago
12

A Product Manager has been given responsibility for overseeing the development of a new software application that will be deploy

ed to a group of Accenture clients. What would be the most time-saving and cost-effective way for the Product Manager to address the new application's security considerations?
Business
1 answer:
Free_Kalibri [48]3 years ago
4 0

Incomplete question. The missing options read;

a. Design the application’s security features after the application’s initial build is complete.  

b. Schedule development of security features after the application’s initial release.  

c. Utilize a DevSecOps approach to incorporate security into the development process from the beginning.  

d. Contract with an external vendor to develop a security solution separately from the main application.

Answer:

<u>a. Design the application’s security features after the application’s initial build is complete.</u>

Explanation:

Remember, our main concern here is to determine <em>the most time-saving and cost-effective way for the Product Manager to address the new application's security considerations.</em>

Hence, if the Product Manager decides to schedule the development of security features after the application’s initial release, this would not be the most time-saving approach. Also, utilizing a DevSecOps approach to incorporate security into the development process from the beginning and contracting with an external vendor to develop a security solution separately from the main application is not the best cost-saving approach.

However, designing the application’s security features after the application’s initial build is complete would be the most time-saving and cost-effective way for the Product Manager to address the new application's security considerations.

You might be interested in
The following is the Easton Company adjusted Trial Balance. Easton Company Adjusted Trial Balance December 31, 2018 Account Titl
postnew [5]

Answer:

Service Revenue           881,105

Wages Expense           (529,000)

Supplies Expense          (42,000)

Rent Expense                 (59,500)

Utilities Expense               (8,000)

Depreciation Expense  (150,000)

Interest Income            <u>     (5,500)   </u>

Net Income                        87,105

Explanation:

We list the revenue account and then, substract the expenses leaving the net income. As this is a single-step income statemnt we do not solve for operating and non-operating income.

7 0
3 years ago
Nora contracts to work for ABC Investments during June for $2,500. On May 31, ABC cancels the contract. Nora refuses to accept a
kap26 [50]

Answer:

c. $500

Explanation:

A contract is an agreement by two or more parties to perform a.certain activity within a given time.

When contract are breached, the beneficiary has the right to gain back the amount promised.

If the beneficiary can get another option, the other party is obligated to pay the balance.

On this instance Nora had the chance to get a new job at $2,000 salary the balance is $2,500 - $2,000= $500. Since she rejected the job she is responsible for that loss.

However ABC is still liable to pay the balance of $500

6 0
3 years ago
The Phoenix Corporation's fiscal year ends on December 31. Phoenix determines inventory quantity by a physical count of inventor
lutik1710 [3]

Answer:

1. Merchandise held on consignment for Trout Creek Clothing.

  • Excluded from the company's year-end inventory because they belong to another company.

2. Goods shipped f.o.b. destination on December 28 that arrived at the customer's location on January 4.

  • Included in the company's year-end inventory because FOB destination shipments transfer ownership only after they are delivered, not while on transit.

3. Goods purchased from a vendor shipped f.o.b. shipping point on December 26 that arrived on January 3.

  • Included in the company's year-end inventory because FOB shipping point shipments transfer ownership after they leave the seller's facilities.

4. Goods shipped f.o.b. shipping point on December 28 that arrived at the customer's location on January 5.

  • Excluded from the company's year-end inventory because FOB shipping point shipments transfer ownership after they leave the seller's facilities, so they belong to the buyer now.

5. Phoenix had merchandise on consignment at Lisa's Markets, Inc.

  • Included in the company's year-end inventory because merchandise on consignment belong to the company, not to Lisa' Market.

6. Goods purchased from a vendor shipped f.o.b. destination on December 27 that arrived on January 3.

  • Excluded from the company's year-end inventory because FOB destination shipments transfer ownership only after they have been delivered, not while in transit.

7. Freight charges on goods purchased in 3.

  • Included in the company's year-end inventory because freight costs under FOB shipping point are paid by the buyer.

3 0
3 years ago
At year​ end, Rebos​ Company's financial statements showed sales of​ $820 million, net income of​ $425 million, total assets of​
Dafna11 [192]

Answer:

total sales $820 million

net income $425 million

total assets $750 million

total liabilities $735

1.2 million outstanding common stocks

an offer was made to buy their assets at $742.5 million

<u>company's book value per share:</u>

= (total assets - total liabilities) / total number of outstanding common stocks

= ($750,000,000 - $735,000,000) / 1,200,000 = $12.50 per stock

<u>company's liquidation value per share:</u>

= (total offer - total liabilities) / total number of outstanding common stocks

= ($742,500,000 - $735,000,000) / 1,200,000 = $6.25 per stock

4 0
3 years ago
In the current year, Oriole Corporation donated a painting worth $30,000 to the Texas Art Museum, a qualified charity. The museu
n200080 [17]

Answer:

$30,000

Explanation:

Oriole Corporation purchased the painting five years ago for $10,000. In the current year, the cost of the same painting is $30,000. Oriole Corporation donated this painting to the Texas Art Museum.

So, Oriole’s charitable contribution deduction is <u>$30,000</u> as the current value of the painting is $30,000.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Daryl enjoys his job because he gets to analyze the security systems in different organizations and provide recommendations to i
    14·2 answers
  • 10 points.............​
    15·2 answers
  • Peggy, a foreman at a petrochemical plant, asks the plant superintendent to hire an additional worker whenever overtime hours fo
    7·1 answer
  • Brookman Inc.’s latest EPS was $2.75, its book value per share was $22.75, it had 315,000 shares outstanding, and its debt/total
    13·1 answer
  • What is a pestle analysis for an escape room
    10·1 answer
  • In a market economy,
    6·1 answer
  • After graduating from high school, Shawn took out a loan to help pay for college. Now, four years later, Shawn has graduated fro
    9·2 answers
  • Trestone, a guitar manufacturing company, produces a thousand units of electric guitars each year. The company has been able to
    10·2 answers
  • Marko, Inc., is considering the purchase of ABC Co. Marko believes that ABC Co. can generate cash flows of $5,200, $10,200, and
    5·1 answer
  • Elegant Limited sells restored classic cars. Most of its customers are private buyers who buy cars for
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!