Delma Banks Jr. was charged with murder; his lawyer failed to vigorously cross-examine an informant testifying against Banks or

Question

3 years ago

13

Delma Banks Jr. was charged with murder; his lawyer failed to vigorously cross-examine an informant testifying against Banks or

to investigate the case. Consequently, Banks may not have received a fair trial because of poor representation. If so, a retentionist would argue that the injustice in the conduct of the trial would Group of answer choices

Social Studies

1 answer:

Andru [333] · Answer 1 · 2022-03-15T01:08:03+03:00

Answer: be irrelevant to the justice or injustice of capital punishment.

Explanation:

From the information given, Banks was charged with murder but his lawyer failed to vigorously cross-examine an informant testifying against Banks or to investigate the case.

Based on the above, since Banks may not have received a fair trial because of poor representation, then a retentionist would argue that the injustice in the conduct of the trial would be irrelevant to the justice or injustice of capital punishment.