Answer: b. No, because the state acted as a market participant
Explanation:
The state in this instance was a market participant because they were acting as buyers who were looking for companies that could supply the service of exploiting their gas fields.
As a result, they have total discretion to pick whichever supplier they choose, regardless of the benefits or lack thereof, much like a normal buyer would do. The interstate company would therefore lose the case.
Answer:
the truck and the cars driving beside it
Explanation:
i think its risky coz the object in the truck could fall over the cars and create unrepairable damage.
A witness that saw or heard certain things but didn’t see the crime happen
Answer:yes you can still be charged but usually the court will have more sympathy since you returned the item but you will have a less harder punishment associated with conviction if convicted
Explanation:
