Answer:
No, I don’t think the Brown court would have said that people could be separated by race on a train. Brown fought against segregation in schools because it was unconstitutional and violated the 14th Amendment. I can’t see why they would agree with segregation in other institutions.
The Plessy case, which occurred quite a bit earlier than the Brown case, ruled that segregation was okay as long as it was “separate but equal.” If it was Plessy v. Brown, Brown could have made the argument that “If it has to be separate, it’s not truly equal.” There’s no reason to divide the people unless there’s unfair treatment involved.
Answer:
B
Explanation:
All southeast Asian countries turning communist was a big fear to the USA and they called this the domino effect because they feared that if one southeast Asian country turned communist, the rest would also
C. He argued that the country’s leaders should focus on correcting injustices at home.
“Why should they ask me
to put on a uniform and
go 10,000 miles from
home and drop bombs
and bullets on brown
people while so-called
Negro people in Louisville
aré treated like dogs”
Ali correctly believed that black Americans were fighting for democratic rights in a foreign country while being denied those same rights here in the US. He saw military service as a hypocrisy and an injustice, which is why he refused his military induction.
I would say B. child care. As you have to provide them with food,water, clothing, etc. Hope this helps!
Answer:The assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand in Sarajevo on 28th June 1914, it triggered a chain of events that resulted in World War 1. After the assassination, Austria-Hungary threatened war on Serbia. ... Germany sided by Austria-Hungary, while Russia sided with the Serbians
Explanation:
