Answer:
A least restrictive environment.
Explanation:
This was been put to place by a Federal Law called Individuals with Disabilities Education Act in the year 2004 which states this about the Least Restrictive Environment. This environ is known to allows a student with disabilities to be educated with his/her non disabled mates to the most extend possible.
Also, these children that are seen to have such abnormalities are said to spend more time with children who are correct and are totally fine; in as much as the defected children learns and stays in different learning environs.
When a child requires a special classroom environment immediately the child’s learning challenge is magnified. Cases sometimes according to research explains that these special classroom environment arise because of a lack of special funding.
Answer: A developmental psychologist would probably describe Emily's temperament as Easy.
Explanation:
Developmental psychologists specialize in analyzing the stages of development that human beings go through. Temperament is a biological component of our personality, we are born with a defined temperament that manifests itself more or less stable throughout our lives.
In babies, it is possible to identify three different types of temperament; the easy, the difficult and slow-to-warm-up.
The easy children are those who easily adapt routines and their surroundings, the difficult children do not regularly adapt routines and react negatively to changes in their environment, and slow-to-warm-up children have a temperament similar to easy children, however, their reactions tend to be slower and with less intensity.
I hope this information can help you.
India is suddenly in the news for all the wrong reasons. It is now hitting the headlines as one of the most unequal countries in the world, whether one measures inequality on the basis of income or wealth.
So how unequal is India? As the economist Branko Milanovic says: “The question is simple, the answer is not.” Based on the new India Human Development Survey (IHDS), which provides data on income inequality for the first time, India scores a level of income equality lower than Russia, the United States, China and Brazil, and more egalitarian than only South Africa.
According to a report by the Johannesburg-based company New World Wealth, India is the second-most unequal country globally, with millionaires controlling 54% of its wealth. With a total individual wealth of $5,600 billion, it’s among the 10 richest countries in the world – and yet the average Indian is relatively poor.
Compare this with Japan, the most equal country in the world, where according to the report millionaires control only 22% of total wealth.
In India, the richest 1% own 53% of the country’s wealth, according to the latest data from Credit Suisse. The richest 5% own 68.6%, while the top 10% have 76.3%. At the other end of the pyramid, the poorer half jostles for a mere 4.1% of national wealth.
What’s more, things are getting better for the rich. The Credit Suisse data shows that India’s richest 1% owned just 36.8% of the country’s wealth in 2000, while the share of the top 10% was 65.9%. Since then they have steadily increased their share of the pie. The share of the top 1% now exceeds 50%.
This is far ahead of the United States, where the richest 1% own 37.3% of total wealth. But India’s finest still have a long way to go before they match Russia, where the top 1% own a stupendous 70.3% of the country’s wealth.
Answer:
In the movie, Tim says that genetic mutations are permanent changes to DNA or RNA. What does this mean? The changes can't be undone. ... Which of the following is an example of a beneficial mutation? When an organism develops immunity to a disease.
Explanation:
