Answer:
Language is the key to inclusion and at the center of human activity, self-expression and identity. This publication recognize the importance that people place on their own language in achieving the MDG Goals. It showcases how language fosters participation in development with lasting results.
Explanation:
:) :)
Answer:
a. the home is considered to be community property, but the ranchland is not
Explanation:
Community property is defined as those property or wealth that a husband an a wife have together. In other words, the property acquired by the a couple after they are legally married are claimed as community property. These properties are equally shared and owned by both husband and wife.
In the context, after marriage, Steven and Andrea bought a house together. So this house is a community property as they have purchased it after their marriage. But the ranchland which Andrea inherited after her father's death will not be treated as a community property.
Hence the correct option is (a).
Answer:
Taking into account that the options for this question are:
A. He should not enter the penalty on Form 1040, and must attach documentation that shows his date of disability.
B. He should write DISABLED on Form 1040 instead of the penalty amount.
C. He must allow the IRS to calculate his penalty, then request a refund using Form 2210.
D. He should file Form 2210 with his tax return and include documentation that shows his date of disability.
The correct answer is: D. He should file Form 2210 with his tax return and include documentation that shows his date of disability.
Explanation:
Many taxpayers can apply for an exemption from the fine. A taxpayer applying for a full waiver may choose to have the penalty determined by the IRS, while a taxpayer applying for a partial waiver must measure the penalty on Form 2210. The taxpayer will add Form 2210 and a statement to his tax return detailing why the estimated tax requirements have not been met and the waiver duration.
Answer:
Explanation:
In game theory, the game of centipede (or centipede), first introduced by Rosenthal in 1981, is an extended form game in which two players take turns choosing between taking a payoff, which grows as it does not you choose to acquire it, and thus end the game, or pass the choice to another player.
The payoffs are however arranged in such a way that if one passes the choice to the opponent and the opponent chooses the payoff in his turn, the player who had passed receives a slightly lower payoff than he would have taken if he had finished the game in his round.
The only perfect Nash balance in the subgames (and every Nash balance) of this game indicates that player 1 should take the payoff in the first game round and leave player 2 with his mouth dry; however, by testing the game empirically, few players do, and as a result they get a higher payoff than expected in the balance analysis.
These results show how a game's solutions represented by the perfect Nash equilibrium in subgames and the Nash equilibrium cannot predict how people play in some circumstances.
The game of centipede is commonly used in introductory courses in game theory to highlight the concept of backward induction and the iterated elimination of dominated strategies, which constitute
