Answer:
y = 4/5
General Formulas and Concepts:
<u>Pre-Algebra</u>
Order of Operations: BPEMDAS
- Brackets
- Parenthesis
- Exponents
- Multiplication
- Division
- Addition
- Subtraction
Equality Properties
- Multiplication Property of Equality
- Division Property of Equality
- Addition Property of Equality
- Subtraction Property of Equality<u>
</u>
Step-by-step explanation:
<u>Step 1: Define</u>
<em>Identify</em>
7/8y + 1/2 = 1 1/5
<u>Step 2: Solve for </u><em><u>y</u></em>
- Convert to improper fraction: 7/8y + 1/2 = 6/5
- [Subtraction Property of Equality] Subtract 1/2 on both sides: 7/8y = 7/10
- [Division Property of Equality] Divide 7/8 on both sides: y = 4/5
Answer:
1.we know the perimeter of the triangle=x-3+x+6+x=3x+3
so,answer is (b)3x+3
2.area of the triangle=1/2*b*h
=1/2*x+2*2x+6=x+2*2x+6/2=2x^2+6x+4x+12/2=2x^2+10x+12/2=2(x^2+5x+6)/2=x^2+5x+6
so,answer is(b)x^2+5x+6
The domain and range of the function is D) Domain: (-∞, ∞); Range: (-∞, ∞)
<h3>How to illustrate the information?</h3>
The domain is the input values, or the x values. We can put in any x values for this function.
Domain : (-∞, ∞)
The range is the output values or the y values. We can get any output values for this function
Range: (-∞, ∞)
Learn more about domain on:
brainly.com/question/2264373
#SPJ1
<u>Complete question:</u>
What are the domain and range of the function below?
A) Domain: (-∞, -5)
Range: (5, ∞)
B) Domain: (-5, -10)
Range: (5, 10)
C). Domain: (-5, 10)
Range: (-10, 5)
D) Domain: (-∞, ∞)
Range: (-∞, ∞)
A regular savings account
Answer:
There is no sufficient evidence to support the executive claim
Step-by-step explanation:
From the question we are told that
The population proportion is 
The sample proportion is 
The sample size is 
The level of significance is 
The null hypothesis is 
The alternative hypothesis is 
Generally the test statistics is mathematically evaluated as

=> 
=> 
The p-value is mathematically represented as

Form the z-table

=> 
=> 
Given that
we fail to reject the null hypothesis
Hence we can conclude that there is no sufficient evidence to support the executive claim