Answer:
I believe the answer to 1. is B, and Grare decisis means substantially the same. Basically based on a court's previous decision in a case, that same decision can be carried out and used in any future cases.
Explanation:
Answer:
Everything you can see with your central and peripheral vision .
I would say they should be spared from death, but not be given freedom if they have gotten the death penalty they should stay in a prison for life with no chance of parole but still have visitors and phone calls
You can determine if a person has changed by running a series of test like a self evaluation and a psychiatric evaluation and the change to repent there action and admit
Answer:
In the landmark supreme court case Miranda v. Arizona (1966), the Court held that if police do not inform people they arrest about certain constitutional rights, including their Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination, then their confessions may not be used as evidence at trial.
Explanation:
.......................By dividing power within the legislative branch, bicameralism helps prevent the legislative branch from having too much power—a kind of intrabranch check. Within the legislative body, bicameralism has historically functioned to balance the power of different social classes or groups within a society
from internet
