Answer: 5/6
Step-by-step explanation:
Find the greatest common factor. I’m this case, the greatest common factor is 9. Now divide both the numerator and denominator by 9. You would get 5/6
Answer:
12 miles
Step-by-step explanation:
Let the amount of hours it takes Leroy to catch up to Kevin equal x. Since speed multiplied by time is distance, Leroy would have run a total of 6x miles(6*x). Kevin already had a head start of 24 minutes, which is the same as 2/5 of an hour. In 2/5 an hour, Kevin ran 2 miles as 2 is 2/5 *5. For the next x hours his distance would be a total of 5x(5*x). This means, after x hours, Kevins distance is 5x + 2. In this case, catching up to someone is the same as having the same distance value. This means we can set the two expressions equal to each other, and solve:
6x = 5x + 2
x = 2
The time it took Leroy to catch up is 2 hours, but we are looking for the distance, which is represented by 6x. We substitute in 2 to get:
6(2) = 12
This means Leroy had to run 12 miles.
Answer:
Answer = 0.25
Step-by-step explanation:
Slope (m) = 0.25
θ = 14.036243467926°
distance (d) = 74.215901261118
ΔX = 72
ΔY = 18
Answer:
(B) The citizens of the city, because they lose help they could have used to buy a home.
Step-by-step explanation:
Nul and alternative hypotheses are:
the rate of home ownership is the same after tax cut
the rate of home ownership is increasing after tax cut
Type II error occurs when one fails to reject null hypothesis when the null hypothesis was wrong.
In this case Type II error happens when the conclusion is the rate of home ownership is not increasing after tax cut, where actually it is.
With this conclusion city council does not continue tax cut, and citizens of the city is harmed because they lose help they could have used to buy a home.
Answer:
Alexis = 59
Becca = 74
Cindy = 152
Step-by-step explanation:
a + b + c = 285
a = b - 15
c = 2b + 4
