Corporations are often accused of despoiling the environment in their quest for profit. Free enterprise is supposedly incompatible with environmental preservation so that government regulation is required.
Such thinking is the basis for current proposals to expand environmental regulation greatly. So many new controls have been proposed and enacted that the late economic journalist Warren Brookes once forecast that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) could well become "the most powerful government agency on earth, involved in massive levels of economic, social, scientific, and political spending and interference.
But if the profit motive is the primary cause of pollution, one would not expect to find much pollution in socialist countries, such as the former Soviet Union, China, and in the former Communist countries of Eastern and Central Europe. That is, in theory. In reality, exactly the opposite is true: The socialist world suffers from the worst pollution on earth. Could it be that free enterprise is not so incompatible with environmental protection after all?
Answer:
This was a problem because the wealthy citizens of the new Latin American countries possessed much needed capital and skills to develop the new nations.
The rulers of the new nations needed these wealthy citizens to provide their capital and labor to start new development processes in agriculture, industry, infraestructure, and so on. When they moved back to Spain, these countries lost the opportunity to make use of this labor and this capital. This contributed indirectly, to the slow advancement of most Latin American nations.
Answer:
They compare quantities for particular categories. View the frequency distribution graph about people who regularly use a specific cell phone app
<u>The correct answer is going to be Antarctica because the temperature is so cold, and Hurricanes need warm water, and Humid air.</u>
<u>Brainliest please!</u>
