The decision to build the park or not would be based solely
on the cost – benefit relationship of this project. Since there is no other
factor considered in this problem, you only need to see if the benefit of
constructing the park would exceed its cost. In this problem, the cost to
construct the park is $20,000 while the marginal benefit would be $24,000
($8,000 x 3 families that can benefit from this project). Therefore, you can
say that the benefit has exceeded its cost. As a conclusion, the neighborhood
park should be built because it benefits the families living in that area more
than its cost.
C: software
in most countries, there are four primary types of intellectual property (IP) that can be legally protected: patents, trademarks, copyrights, and trade secrets.
Copyrights do not protect ideas, but rather the manner in which ideas are expressed (“original works of authorship”) - written works, art, music, architectural drawings, or even programming code for software
Answer:
a. Product, price, distribution, and promotion variables
Explanation:
As a customer requires various attributes of the product, that is for which the customer will not compromise in, these include:
The product needed, as for the customer is hungry he shall ask for a pizza, now pizza is a product.
The price of the product, if the price is in the budget of the customer he shall buy it else he shall not buy it.
Distribution associated with it basically the method in which it will be distributed, the packaging extracts.
Promotion variables includes extra benefits like offered with the product, cash backs as for example, etc:
Answer:
$4,000
Explanation:
The computation of the cash to be required to settle the liability is shown below:
= Purchase value of inventory - returned inventory which was purchased
= $5,000 - $1,000
= $4,000
It is a net purchase plus it is the cash required to settle the liability
There is no discount applied in the question as dates are not given so we ignored it.
Answer:
<u>c. there is the possibility that the funds are used for riskier behavior than the lender agreed to.</u>
Explanation:
True. The term "Moral Hazard" as used in an investment context, often refers to a scenario where one party with a <em>lesser risk burden</em> in a business agreement, <u>deliberately </u>takes investment risk that would be detrimental to others in the agreement who have a higher risk burden.
It is an unethical business practice; a moral hazard, and so acts as a barrier to investors who may want to finance global growth.
