Answer:
Trust,
Explanation:
The movement during the vietnam war was to ensure trust and peace by being drawn off and calm
Both sides had very opposite views of the constitution- the federalist advocated for a strong central government with a national bank while the Anti Federalist believed this would give the central government too much power. In order to compromise the bill of rights was created which stated the rights of the people and the states. The federalist didn’t believe this was necessary because the constitution already stated the states rights, but the anti federalist were not going to budge unless the bill of rights was included. The Great compromise was also created to account for the slaves in the south. The south believed that they should have more representation in the congress due to the higher population when including the slaves than the north. To compromise every 5 slaves counted for 3 citizens, This was called the three-fifths compromise. This rule applied for the House of Rep where the amount of congressmen per state was based on population (favored by the south) , while the senate only allows 2 senators per state (favored by the north).
hope this helps :)
Answer:
1. China
2. Paper
3. Wealth
4. Silk Road
Explanation:
The Han dynasty is known as a golden age because of the growth in <em><u>China.</u></em>
Many important inventions came from this time period, including <u><em>paper.</em></u>
Royal tombs were filled with images that represented <u><em>wealth</em></u>.
Buddhism spread northward into China along the <u><em>Silk Road</em></u>.
<span>President franklin d roosevelt referred to December 7, 1941 as "a date which will live in infamy" because on that day the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor, which brought America into World War II. </span>
Answer:
Plessy v. Ferguson was a landmark 1896 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld the constitutionality of racial segregation under the “separate but equal” doctrine. The case stemmed from an 1892 incident in which African American train passenger Homer Plessy refused to sit in a car for blacks. Rejecting Plessy’s argument that his constitutional rights were violated, the Supreme Court ruled that a law that “implies merely a legal distinction” between whites and blacks was not unconstitutional. As a result, restrictive Jim Crow legislation and separate public accommodations based on race became commonplace.
