Answer:
The correct option is;
Simpson Paradox
Step-by-step explanation:
The phenomenon whereby particular trends are prevalent in small data portions but are not evident or an inverse trend is observe when the portions are joined together is known as Simpson's paradox.
Whereby the data for calculating the bating averages as found online are given as follows;
Season, Derek Jeter David Justice
1995, 12/48 = 0.250 104/411 ≈ 0.253
1996, 183/582 ≈ 0.314 45/140 ≈ 0.321
The overall hits to the overall bats ratio are;
, (183 + 12)/(582 + 48) ≈0.310 (104+45)/(411+140) = 0.27
Which shows that Derek Jeter's overall average was better than Justice's average
Answer:
Choice A: x^2−2x+4− 15/x+2
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Cubic feet = Length (3 1/3 feet) x Width (2 2/3 feet) x Height (2 1/3 feet)
Step-by-step explanation:
3 1/3 x 2 2/3 x 2 1/3 = approximately 20.74 cubic feet
The correct answer to this question is letter "<span> C. There may be other hitters in the 320s, but they didn't make the top 30." </span>his distribution of data shows lots of lifetime averages in the middle classes, but tails off sharply at both the upper and lower ends. The statement that best explains the fact that there are very few averages in the lowest class is that t<span>here may be other hitters in the 320s, but they didn't make the top 30.</span>
Answer:
11:13
Step-by-step explanation:
132:156
Split in half
66:78
Again
33:39
By 3
11:13
