The answers are the following:
a.
Brandon:
$7,000 + [($10,000/4)×3¿= $8,500
Ryan:
$7,000 + [($10,000/4)×1¿= $7,500
b.
Brandon $7,000
Ryan <span>$7,000</span>
Answer:
Answer is given below.
Explanation:
it is absolutely exploitative to adjust the maturing of the records receivable with no legitimate explanation so as to diminish the remittance made so as to expand the benefit and show an off base monetary record figures to the partners. The controller can't subjectively choose to change the records receivable to cut down the noncollectable records as at some point or another a similar will be found during review and a similar will be hailed off as a fake. The long haul results you would confront incorporate landing terminated from the position, having your authorized dropped in the event that you are CPA and may likewise confront lawful prosecutions. You should disclose to the controller that so as to simply introduce a decent benefit for the present year it can place into the danger for the future and put their vocation in question. Additionally, a similar won't be valued by the investors and the organization may go on free its altruism.
The answer is: A - have more control.
Answer:
$6,100
Explanation:
Calculation to determine what The amount of bad debt expense recorded on December 31 will be:
Using this formula
Bad debt expense=(Estimated % of accounts receivable*Accounts Receivable ending +balance)+Unadjusted balance of Allowance for Uncollectible Accounts
Let plug in the formula
Bad debt expense=(7%*$80,000)+$500
Bad debt expense=$5,600+$500
Bad debt expense=$6,100
Therefore The amount of bad debt expense recorded on December 31 will be:$6,100
I think a is the correct answer let me know if This helps
