All categories

3 years ago

If the scale factor was 1.5 would that create an enlargement or reducti of the original figure?

Mathematics

1 answer:

puteri [66]3 years ago

7 0

If we take for example 20x1.5=30 the scale factor would create an enlargement

You might be interested in

Can you give an example of equations when you are given the constant of proportionality?

aleksandr82 [10.1K]

Example:
Proportionality=1
5=5x
Divide both sides by 5 , and you get 1=x,
so the proportionality is 1

6 0

3 years ago

4x-<img src="https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B3%7D" id="TexFormula1" title="\frac{1}{3}" alt="\frac{1}{3}" align="absmid

Delvig [45]

The answer most likely is 9

6 0

3 years ago

The black triangle was transformed to make the gray triangle. Write an

sergeinik [125]

Answer:

m<4 = 117 degrees

Step-by-step explanation:

Knowing that angle 1 is 63 degrees, we can look at the other angle on the same side of the line, angle 4.

Angles on one side of a line add to 180 degrees.

180 - 63 = 117

6 0

3 years ago

Solve by the multiplication of equality 5/49*x = 20/7

WARRIOR [948]

5/49(x) = 20/7
5x/49 = 20/7
5x/49 × 49 = 20/7 × 49
5x = 140
5x / 5 = 140 / 5
x = 28

7 0

3 years ago

Find the form of the general solution of y^(4)(x) - n^2y''(x)=g(x)

Dennis_Churaev [7]

The differential equation

$y^{(4)}-n^2y'' = g(x)$

has characteristic equation

r ⁴ - n ² r ² = r ² (r ² - n ²) = r ² (r - n) (r + n) = 0

with roots r = 0 (multiplicity 2), r = -1, and r = 1, so the characteristic solution is

$y_c=C_1+C_2x+C_3e^{-nx}+C_4e^{nx}$

For the non-homogeneous equation, reduce the order by substituting u(x) = y''(x), so that u''(x) is the 4th derivative of y, and

$u''-n^2u = g(x)$

Solve for u by using the method of variation of parameters. Note that the characteristic equation now only admits the two exponential solutions found earlier; I denote them by u₁ and u₂. Now we look for a particular solution of the form

$u_p = u_1z_1 + u_2z_2$

where

$\displaystyle z_1(x) = -\int\frac{u_2(x)g(x)}{W(u_1(x),u_2(x))}\,\mathrm dx$

$\displaystyle z_2(x) = \int\frac{u_1(x)g(x)}{W(u_1(x),u_2(x))}\,\mathrm dx$

where W (u₁, u₂) is the Wronskian of u₁ and u₂. We have

$W(u_1(x),u_2(x)) = \begin{vmatrix}e^{-nx}&e^{nx}\\-ne^{-nx}&ne^{nx}\end{vmatrix} = 2n$

and so

$\displaystyle z_1(x) = -\frac1{2n}\int e^{nx}g(x)\,\mathrm dx$

$\displaystyle z_2(x) = \frac1{2n}\int e^{-nx}g(x)\,\mathrm dx$

So we have

$\displaystyle u_p = -\frac1{2n}e^{-nx}\int_0^x e^{n\xi}g(\xi)\,\mathrm d\xi + \frac1{2n}e^{nx}\int_0^xe^{-n\xi}g(\xi)\,\mathrm d\xi$

and hence

$u(x)=C_1e^{-nx}+C_2e^{nx}+u_p(x)$

Finally, integrate both sides twice to solve for y :

$\displaystyle y(x)=C_1+C_2x+C_3e^{-nx}+C_4e^{nx}+\int_0^x\int_0^\omega u_p(\xi)\,\mathrm d\xi\,\mathrm d\omega$

7 0

3 years ago