Answer:
Option D. Any of the above.
Explanation:
The reason is that the contract is not formed until the both parties don't agree on the terms and conditions of the contract which includes:
- New terms and conditions because as we know the business environment is consistently changing like inflation changes, etc (Option A).
- The acceptance is always required for the contract formation (Option B).
- Additional clauses of the contract are new clauses and acceptance is required for these to form a contract (Option C).
So all of the options can alter the contract existence. So the right answer is option D.
Answer:
$277,125
Explanation:
The calculation of income tax expense is shown below:-
Income tax expense = Income taxes payable at the end of 2022 + (Rent revenue ÷ 2) × Tax rate
= $258,000 + (($153,000 ÷ 2) × 0.25)
= $258,000 + $76,500 × 0.25
= $258,000 + $19,125
= $277,125
Therefore for computing the income tax revenue we simply applied the above formula.
Answer: The cost of the equipment is $66,500.
Explanation: Under IAS 16 Property, Plant and Equipment, the cost of an asset comprises:
- purchase price plus import duties and taxes
- any costs directly attributable to bringing the asset to the location and condition necessary for it to be capable of operating in a manner intended by management
- the initial estimate of the costs of dismantling and removing the item and restoring the site on which it is located
In the question, $60,000 was the purchase price, the transportation cost of $1,000 was necessary to bring the asset to the location intended by management, $3,000 was the sales tax and the installation cost of $2,500 was also necessary for the asset to function as intended by management. So all these costs would be capitalized as the cost of the equipment as $66,500.
Research skills
(Time management is lower on the totem pole while the other 2 are on the bottom)
Answer:
Promissory estoppel
Explanation:
Promissory estoppel means that in legal tenet that a promise or pledge can be enforced by law, actually if formulated without legal consideration, if the George now the (promisor) has made a pledge to a Susy the (promises) who then depends on that promise for a subsequent detriment. So what Promissory estoppel is expected to do is to stop the (George) promisor from insisting that an underlying promise should not be legally authorized or implemented. So Susy can sue George on the basis of promissory estoppel and get a reward for George's disappointment
