Answer:
Aversive Racism
Explanation:
Aversive racism: The term aversive racism is known as a theory which was introduced by John F. Dovidio and Samuel L. Gaertner and is defined as the process through which an individual experience negative evaluation towards a particular ethnic or racial minorities via persistent or continuous interaction avoidance with the different ethnic or racial group. It is distinguished as having an ambivalent and complex attitude or expressions towards the other races.
In the question above, the given statement signifies the aversive racism.
Term used for a situation in which paired-choice voting by majority rule fails to produce a consistent ranking of society's preferences for public goods is the paradox of voting.
The paradox of voting, also known as Downs' paradox, states that the costs of voting usually outweigh the expected benefits for a rational, self-interested voter. Because the likelihood of exercising the pivotal vote is negligible in comparison to any reasonable estimate of the private individual benefits of the various possible outcomes, the expected benefits of voting outweigh the costs.
Responses to the paradox of voting have included the belief that voters vote to express their preference for a candidate rather than to influence the outcome of the election, that voters exercise some altruism, or that the paradox ignores the collateral benefits associated with voting that are not related to the resulting electoral outcome.
Learn more about paradox of voting here:
brainly.com/question/17136492
#SPJ4
2nd - Right to bare arms
3rd - Gov. cannot force people to quarter troops in their homes.
7th - Right to jury trial in a civil case
9th - States are not limited to those listed in the constitution (First 8)
10th - Powers not given to the federal gov. are reserved for states.
Answer: C
Explanation: monasticism emerged in the late 3rd century and had become an established institution in the christian church by the 4th century
<u>The need to form compacts with other states:</u>
They make compact agreements with other states because they wanted to achieve together and what the neighbouring states having the problems of doing alone. They make the contract for the sharing enforcement data and the development of the water,oil, wildlife.
They believe the full faith and credits clause of the constitution and require each states to honour and enforce the laws, official documents and the court ruling of other states. The states of the compacts to form one to another to have the relationship with the other states.
