I don't have an exact answer but write down what the summary of the speech is about and use those as answers.
Sorry
Answer:
The national origins quota system ended.
Explanation:
Migration refers to the movement of a group of people from one geographical region (location) to another geographical destination in search of better living conditions, work or social amenities.
Population change equation states that the change in the size of a population over a specific period of time is equal to the sum of the number of births and the number of immigrants that joined.
Mathematically, the population change equation is given by the formula;
Population Change = (Natality - Mortality) + (Immigration - Emigration)
The Immigration Act and Naturalization of 1965 is also referred to as the Hart-Celler Act and it was enacted by the IS Congress to abolish the previous quota system based on national origins in the United States of America.
Hence, an effect of the Immigration Act of 1965 was that it ended the national origins quota system.
The correct answer is letter D.
Explanation: Factionalism is therefore rooted in the nature of man, and exists everywhere: not only in political aspects, but also, for example, in religion and elsewhere. Madison states that “a more common and enduring source of factions, however, has been a diverse and unequal distribution of ownership.
Before embarking on the series of court cases that argued for his freedom, Scott’s life was the rootless existence typical of many slaves. Born around 1799 in Virginia, he moved with his owner Peter Blow to Alabama and eventually to St. Louis, where he was sold to U.S. Army Dr. John Emerson in the early 1830s.
Like many antebellum officers, Emerson was transferred from post to post through Western states and territories. During those journeys, Scott married a slave woman named Harriet Robinson in 1836. When Emerson died in 1843, Scott, by then the father of two children, likely hoped the doctor’s will would manumit him—and his family—but it did not. Scott then offered Emerson’s brother-in-law and executor, J.A. Sanford, $300 hoping to buy his own freedom. But the offer was turned down. Scott decided to take the matter to the courts.
By 1846, Scott was living in St. Louis in service to Emerson’s widow. He filed suit with the state of Missouri, claiming that since he had lived with Emerson in Illinois—where slavery was outlawed by the 1787 Northwest Ordinance—and Fort Snelling in Minnesota—where the Missouri Compromise outlawed slavery in 1820—he was entitled to his freedom. In an interesting twist, the children of Peter Blow, Scott’s first owner, provided the slave family financial assistance.
Answer:
Number 1
Explanation:
New Orleans is located in Louisiana :)
