By about 2050, the <u>elderly</u> populations in <u>low income countries</u> are expected to boom.
It is expected that in the next thirty years, the world's population would increase by 2 billion persons, that is, become 9.7 billion instead of the present 7.7 billion.
The older population is increasing because of the increased life expectancy as well as the falling fertility levels. Several countries are experiencing a reduction in population size and their number keeps on increasing.
This change eventually has a major impact on the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals or the SDGs, which are the globally agreed targets to achieve economic stability over years.
To learn more about population, click
brainly.com/question/27991860
#SPJ4
Answer:
Three preconditions of development are increased trade, improved transportation networks, and entrepreneurship.
Explanation:
In the context of W. W. Rostow's preconditions of economic development, an economy begins to transition from a subsistence-based economy based on agriculture and barter where there is only limited amounts of capital into a society where there is increased specialization and increasing transportation networks in order to foment trade. Because people start to generate more income from trade and production surpluses, there is greater entrepreneurship and industriousness. Societies begin to trade primary products with other nations. At present, the notion of sustainable development is dominant in the literature and in development spheres like NGOs and International organizations. This entails some controls of population pressure and efficient, renewable uses of environmental resources.
Answer:
B. Crack down on government corruption.
Explanation:
Answer:
<em>I can see that there are no choices.</em>
fallacy of bandwagon
Explanation:
A "logical fallacy" refers to the error of reasoning or logical gap that makes an argument invalid.
The situation above commits the fallacy of the bandwagon because the argument is being supported only according to a significant number of population. This is a fallacy because it doesn't necessarily mean all of the retired persons are unhappy about the level of Social Security assistance due to the opinion of 30 persons who agreed that they were unhappy. It becomes a "standalone justification" of the validity of an argument. We cannot judge the happiness or unhappiness of all retired persons according only to a group of 30 persons <em>(even though they were chosen from different parts of the country). </em>
So, this explains the answer.
I believe the last answer because decisions are run through all 3 branch’s before being made official.
