Answer:
Hey there!
The U.S used amendments to change the constitution.
Let me know if this helps :)
Answer:
Progressives
Explanation:
The 16th Amendment is the Amendment that allows Congress to legalize an income tax that would vary on the income of an individual or corporation. Many businesses and wealthy individuals did not enjoy the new taxation because since they had more money, they would tax more than others. But the 16th Amendment was a result of the Progressive Era that aimed to make a series of reforms.
The term in question is Rust Belt.
Explanation:
During the 1970's and 1980's the economic landscape was rapidly changing, with some industries experiencing downfall, while new ones were on the rise. This caused bug economic problems in some parts of the United States, and the economic problems caused job losses and population losses. It seemed that some areas of the country fall apart, so the people started moving out to look for better opportunities.
The areas, roughly stretching as a belt, got the name Rust Belt. The term is derogatory itself, and the ''Rust'' is symbolism for the collapsing industrial objects that were left to rust. Numerous industrial centers lost their status and power, while others benefited from this situation, so there was big shift in economic power in this region. The states that were mostly affected by this were:
- West Virginia
- Pennsylvania
- New York
- Michigan
- Illinois
- Iowa
- Indiana
- Ohio
- Wisconsin
Learn more about the industries in the United States brainly.com/question/10452885
#learnwithBrainly
C.) To fuel space exploration programs
C is the correct answer because through the process of elimination, we know that European countries are trying to find energy sources the reduce the amount of air pollution, so A is not correct. Also, we know B is not correct because since fossil fuels aren't always widely available in Europe, drastically running out, and the population of the continent keeps increasing, European countries are struggling to keep up with the demand for fossil fuels. As a result, they are trying to find cheap, renewable energy resources to keep up with the demands of the ever-growing population. Let's skip to D. D is not correct at all because European countries actually <em>do </em>want to find new renewable energy sources, for the reasons stated in A and B. By investing in them, European countries are funding scientists to help harness the power of nature (solar, wind, hydroelectric, etc...). Let's go back to C. Yes, a huge amount of fossil fuels are used for fuel in a rocket, and scientists may be trying to find ways to use renewable energy instead of precious fossil fuels, but is that a main reason for European countries investing in new sources of energy? No, it may be a <em>minor </em>reason, not even a reason at all, but definitely <em>not </em>a main reason. After looking at answer choices A, B, and D, you can conclude C is not a reason for why European countries have invested in new sources of energy.
Answer:
I would say your most likely answer would be D. Only because A did not make since, B would not be sufficient, C is to brod of a answer and D has statics
Explanation:
