The election of 1848 did nothing to quell the controversy over whether slavery would advance into the Mexican Cession. Some slaveholders, like President Taylor, considered the question a moot point because the lands acquired from Mexico were far too dry for growing cotton and therefore, they thought, no slaveholder would want to move there. Other southerners, however, argued that the question was not whether slaveholders would want to move to the lands of the Mexican Cession, but whether they could and still retain control of their slave property. Denying them the right to freely relocate with their lawful property was, they maintained, unfair and unconstitutional. Northerners argued, just as fervidly, that because Mexico had abolished slavery, no slaves currently lived in the Mexican Cession, and to introduce slavery there would extend it to a new territory, thus furthering the institution and giving the Slave Power more control over the United States. The strong current of antislavery sentiment—that is, the desire to protect white labor—only increased the opposition to the expansion of slavery into the West.
For #1 it is C. They kept expanding into Native American’s land. The natives didn’t like that so that led to many conflicts.
For #2 it is D. People could get to destinations a lot faster and cheaper so it led to spread of people and ideas. It also led to goods being easier to transfer to new markets for new business opportunities.
Well over 75% of citizens in Mexico practice Catholicism , so the answer would be True.
The best and most correct answer among the choices provided by the question is the second choice "His role as a military commander during World War I"<span>
<span>Mustafa Kemal Atatürk was a Turkish army officer, revolutionary, and founder of the Republic of Turkey, serving as its first President from 1923 until his death in 1938.</span>
I hope my answer has come to your help. God bless and have a nice day ahead!
</span>
