2 Is your answer!!:D
Hope this helps!
Brainliest if pessable please!! :)
~Summer
He is in the precontemplation stage of the transtheoretical model,where he shows no intention of changing their behavior, and does not see an behavior as a problem when asked.
This matched his case that he does not believe he will get a lung cancer from smoking cigarettes(does not see the behavior as an problem) and does not want to quit smoking(no intention of changing the behavior).
Hope it helps!
Answer:
This is an example of masked-man fallacy.
Explanation:
The masked-man is a fallacy in which two people or objects are mistakenly considered to be either identical or completely different. The most common example used to explain it is the following:
I know who Joshua is.
I don't know who the masked man is.
Therefore, Joshua is not the masked man.
In the example above, Joshua and the masked man are considered different, unrelated. <u>In the situation we are analyzing here, the opposite happens. To reach the conclusion that Tamiko stole Maya's shoes, we are making the huge mistake of not considering any other possibility. Tamiko could very well have an identical-looking pair of shoes; Maya could have lent Tamiko her shoes and forgotten about it, and so on. Therefore, assuming that the shoes are the same, that they belong to Maya and have been stolen, is a result of wrong reasoning and an example of masked-man fallacy.</u>
Fbdndbdbd sbs s bsbanasnndndbdbd
D) The United States issued the Stimson Doctrine, which
stated that America refused to recognize any territorial changes made as a
result of Japanese aggression in Manchuria. The United States publicly stated
that their government disagreed with Japan's actions. Henry Stimson, the U.S. Secretary of War,
issued a moral statement condemning Japan's invasion of Manchuria.
