Answer:♀️
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
<u><em></em></u>
- <u><em>Yes, it is reasonable to expect that more than one subject will experience headaches</em></u>
Explanation:
Notice that where it says "assume that 55 subjects are randomly selected ..." there is a typo. The correct statement is "assume that 5 subjects are randomly selected ..."
You are given the table with the probability distribution, assuming, correctly, the binomial distribution with n = 5 and p = 0.732.
- p = 0.732 is the probability of success (an individual experiences headaches).
- n = 5 is the number of trials (number of subjects in the sample).
The meaning of the table of the distribution probability is:
The probability that 0 subjects experience headaches is 0.0014; the probability that 1 subject experience headaches is 0.0189, and so on.
To answer whether it <em>is reasonable to expect that more than one subject will experience headaches</em>, you must find the probability that:
- X = 2 or X = 3 or X = 4 or X = 5
That is:
- P(X = 2) + P(X = 3) + P(X = 4) + P(X = 5).
That is also the complement of P(X = 0) or P(X = 1)
From the table:
- P(X = 0) = 0.0014
- P(X = 1) = 0.0189
Hence:
- 1 - P(X = 0) - P(X = 1) = 1 - 0.0014 - 0.0189 = 0.9797
That is very close to 1; thus, it is highly likely that more than 1 subject will experience headaches.
In conclusion, <em>yes, it is reasonable to expect that more than one subject will experience headaches</em>
In my opinion, Darrin's inference is wrong because according to given question, "<em>Darrin surveyed a random sample of 10 students from his science class about their favorite types of TV shows.</em><em>"</em><em> </em>
This line provides the information that the survey is taken randomly. Also, if Darrin had taken some other students, then the ineference of other new students compared with previously surveyed students will be different.
This frankly tells that <em>t</em><em>h</em><em>e</em><em> </em><em>p</em><em>r</em><em>o</em><em>b</em><em>a</em><em>b</em><em>i</em><em>l</em><em>i</em><em>t</em><em>y</em><em> </em><em>i</em><em>s</em><em> </em><em>d</em><em>i</em><em>f</em><em>f</em><em>e</em><em>r</em><em>e</em><em>n</em><em>t</em><em> </em><em>a</em><em>l</em><em>w</em><em>a</em><em>y</em><em>s</em><em>.</em>
Therefore, Darrin's inference is wrong or invalid.
Answer:
A. The two lines are neither parallel nor perpendicular.
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer: 2 over 1
Step-by-step explanation:
1+1=2
However we want this as a fraction
Any whole number as a fraction is just over one
Therefore the final answer is 2 over 1
You’re welcome Kaeya!
