Answer:
It should be greater than $36
Explanation:
The opportunity cost of working is the amount of money sacrificed or could have earned if the individual was not working. In this case, Claire has decided to go with her friend which means that the opportunity cost of not working is less than the benefits receives from going out. Because she is not working it means that the opportunity cost of working is more than 36 dollars, which is the income she could have earned in 3 hours.
Answer:
c. feels the marginal benefit of an extra hour of studying exceeds the marginal cost of not playing basketball.
Explanation:
Russel made a choice to study for an hour instead of playing basketball. When making choices people weigh the benefits of an action against its opportunity cost.
Opportunity cost is the forgone alternative when we choose to do something.
In this instance Russell chose to study and the opportunity cost was to enjoy playing a basketball game.
For him to choose to study it means he saw the benefit of reading to be greater than the marginal cost of playing basketball. So he chose the most beneficial activity for him.
Answer:
The correct answer is (A)
Explanation:
Normally, goods which close substitutes tend to have more elastic demand as it is easier to switch from one brand to another because they are close substitutes. For example, if the price of Pepsi increases the consumers will easily shift towards Coca-Cola. So, close substitutes are price sensitive and they have high elastic demand compared to other goods.
Answer:
Allocate existing resources more efficiently among competing uses.
Explanation:
The main goal of resource development is to find ways that allocate resources more efificiently, to spread the available resources in a way that maximizes economic and social benefit taking into account the different competing uses.
Resource development does not necessarily promote central planning because it can make use of market strategies to achieve its goal, and it cannot increase the amount of resources available as well, because these are determined by the natural endownment that each area has.
Answer:
The correct answer is c. Prospect theory.
Explanation:
Prospective theory belongs to behavioral economics and stands out as an alternative model to the expected utility theory, since the validity of the rational agent's neoclassical assumption is questioned. This theory was developed by Nobel laureate Daniel Kahneman and his collaborator Amos Tversky in his »Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk” (1979). They used the results obtained from both his own empirical observations, as of several experiments.
Individuals set preferences based on a specific situation and circumstances, rather than in absolute terms. This means that depending on their initial situation, agents will act in one way or another. One of the results of this reasoning leads to behavioral asymmetries between situations of possible losses or gains. Individuals, for example, are generally more risk averse than profit lovers. An endowment effect is also derived from this analysis, since the compensation required by someone to dispose of a good is greater than what they would be willing to pay to acquire it.
