This would be a general partnership because both parties are responsible equally.
Answer:
C) $128.15
Explanation:
The computation of the intrinsic value of Innovative Components’ equity per share is shown below:
= Retained earnings ÷ number of shares issued × PE ratio
= $2,014,802 ÷ 402,500 shares × 24.6
= $128.15
We simply applied the above formula so that the intrinsic value of Innovative Components’ equity per share could come
and ignored the company PE ratio of 24.6
Answer:
Option A. The U.S. Constitution.
Explanation:
The reason is that the US constitution provides the basic framework for the laws to be formulated and passed both in the US National Assembly and the Senate. The laws cannot be formulated if the US constitution doesn't allows the passing of the law which means that the constitution must be amended first. When the slavery was to be eliminated in 1865, the first problem was that passing the elimination of slavery law was inconflict with the US constitution. So the constitution was amended before passing the law to eliminate the conflict.
In the nutshell, every law originates because of different reasons like Technological reasons, Social reasons, Cultural reason, etc) but the basis remains the same which is US constitution which is the basic framework for passing the law.
The relationship between the straight-line and double-declining-balance method is that they D. Produce the same total depreciation over an asset's useful life.
<h3>How are the straight-line and double-declining-balance methods related?</h3>
While they do not produce the same depreciation every year, they will eventually depreciate an asset in the same way overtime.
What this means is that both methods will depreciate an asset by the same amount at the end of the asset's life. However, the depreciation amounts will vary by method on an annual basis.
In conclusion, option D is correct.
Find out more on depreciation methods at brainly.com/question/26948130.
Answer:
C :Job 1000, $1,860; Job 1001, $3,100
Explanation:
The computation of the total cost is shown below:
For Job 1000:
= Direct materials + Direct labor hours × wage rate per hour × Direct labor hours × overhead rate per hour
= $1,200 + 30 × $15 + 30 × $7
= $1,200 + $450 + $210
= $1,860
For Job 1001:
= Direct materials + Direct labor hours × wage rate per hour × Direct labor hours × overhead rate per hour
= $2,000 + 50 × $15 + 50 × $7
= $2,000 + $750 + $350
= $3,100