Answer:
external
Explanation:
The process of applying the conclusion of a particular scientific study into a study which is outside its context is said to be external validity. The conclusions derived in one particular study is applied to other situations through external validity. There are cases when such generalization brings a negative result to the study. Also, the factor of generalization is limited to some extent.
Answer: The Grocery store is the defendant
Explanation: A defendant is someone, company or an organisation being sued or accused of comiting a crime and is charged to court to defend his or herself, in the case of an organization or company being charged to court needs to defend and absorb itself of all crime.
In the case of Adrianna, the grocery store being the defendant needs to defend itself in court against Adrianna's claims and prove that it's not guilty of her claims. If found guilty the grocery store will pay for damages, her hospital bills and injuries the fall might have caused.
Answer: the second one: “work together to make just and equal laws”
Explanation:
The Pilgrims didn’t have the Native Americans in mind when they made the Compact, so the first one isn’t correct. The Pilgrims also didn’t have the Spanish in mind, and technically they were on the way to New England when they made the Compact, so they didn’t know whether or not the Spanish made a fort, so the second one is incorrect. Finally, the third one is incorrect because the Pilgrims were very strict when it came to their religion, and church was a must.
Answer: A
Explanation: his rule was to over see the debates
