C - He feared the control Standard Oil had in the market.
Roosevelt wanted to break up Standard Oil so they would not be able to form a monopoly and control the market.
This seems like an extremely biased "class." This is a very controversial topic that I can see both sides to, but for sakes of this question, will only explain the counter argument. How can you advocate killing people to spread a message not to kill people. Does it not seem ironic and oxymoronic to say "We don't support killing people, and we are going to show this by killing people who do it!" Also, some people believe the death penalty is too easy. Some victims' families would like the person to spend the rest of their life slowly dying in prison. Another bug argument is how humane is it? Obviously the electric chair is going to hurt, and even with lethal injection, there have been errors resulting in people having seizures and other body attacks while strapped to a table. These methods are not full proof and can be very inhumane.
Answer:
D. Hurricanes
Explanation:
I think I'm correct, but if I'm not, please don't be mad.
<span>Accountability is essential to good governance because it
shows how responsible an official is. If
he takes responsibility for mistakes that he made, it shows that how honest our
governments are. Also they would take
steps to correct errors that occur during their watch. These people are either afraid or don’t want
to be held accountable for their actions and if a officials can’t be held
accountable for their acts, then the people have no power in government and
worse there is no justice.</span>
