1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Orlov [11]
4 years ago
8

What was one reason Japan invaded Manchuria in 1931?

History
2 answers:
r-ruslan [8.4K]4 years ago
6 0
<span>Japanese militarists hoped to build an empire to rival western colonial empires.--Manchuria was rich in iron ore needed to become an industrial power. 

Japan hoped to become a 'western' power by gaining an empire. Manchuria was a good choice because of the resources available to Japan for industry. These resources would allow for more modern transportation and the creation of a steel industry. 


</span>
DanielleElmas [232]4 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Japanese militarists hoped to build an empire to rival western colonial empires

Explanation:

You might be interested in
12. Which of the following is NOT a First Amendment
kozerog [31]

Answer:

D

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Mao Zedong launched the Cultural Revolution in China in response to
Gelneren [198K]
Mao Zedong launched the Cultural Revolution in China in response to what he and other Chines viewed as social encroachments from the west that were threatening the Chinese way of life. 
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The 1964 Gulf of Tonkin Resolution
Lady bird [3.3K]
If I am correct, the answer should be D. 

Hope this Helps! :)
4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which two of the following are direct effects of the September 11 attacks?
Alika [10]
The killing of Osama Bin Laden and the USA Patriot Act is the answer to your question.
5 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The dred scott decision
prohojiy [21]

Answer:

The Dred Scott decision was the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling on March 6, 1857, that having lived in a free state and territory did not entitle an slaved person, Dred Scott, to his freedom. In essence, the decision argued that, as someone's property, Scott was not a citizen and could not sue in a federal court. The majority opinion by Chief Justice Roger B. Taney also stated that Congress had no power to exclude slavery from the territories (thus invalidating the Missouri Compromise [1820]) and that African Americans could never become U.S. citizens.

Explanation:

5 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • What did Olympe de Gouges and Mary Wollstonecraft have in common?
    9·2 answers
  • Which is an example of diplomacy?
    13·1 answer
  • What did these have in common? House of Burgesses Mayflower Compact New England town meetings
    15·1 answer
  • Historically, what has been the policy of most countries regarding indian languages in latin america?
    15·1 answer
  • What unfair conditions existed in pre-revolutionary France?
    7·1 answer
  • Identify two reasons for the Indian partition.
    12·2 answers
  • In what two areas did progressivism fail to address?
    5·1 answer
  • 9. Which of the following is an accurate statement about the Justinian Code? (5 points)
    15·2 answers
  • Which statements accurately describe English settlement in north america?
    12·2 answers
  • NEED HELP ASAP
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!