Answer:
I will write only facts as they are presented through historic methods
Explanation:
Given that it is true that, bias and interpretation can influence an individual's perspective as an observer. To avoid this interpretation bias, it is better to write only facts as they are presented through historic methods. This implies that individuals should have or seek the facts and establish them appropriately without settling for personal understanding, Opinions should not serve as a basis for analyzed data. Hence, it is advisable to get the first-hand documents to avoid biases from the documents at hand.
Therefore, bias and interpretation can influence my perspective as an observer, so I will write only facts as they are presented through historic methods.
The class conflict in Rome ultimately led to the fall of the republic and the institution of monarchy
Explanation:
It is something that is hard to think of in the modern democratic terms but the average population of Rome was the one that preferred the aristocracy of a King over the rule of the Republic.
The Republic had created the elite class of people that had the most rights, the most powers and the least responsibly for the well being of the less fortunate.
This is why the conflict between the two classes ended up in popular support for a monarchy.
Answer:
The both sides of the Atlantic are America and Europe. In America there was the American Revolution in the US at the end of the 18th century. There were also similar revolutions in Latin American Countries in the 19th century, but they're usually called "war of Independence", not revolution.
From the late 19th century, and especially after 1920, under the leadership of Mahatma Gandhi, Congress became the principal leader of the Indian independence movement. Congress led India to independence from Great Britain, and powerfully influenced other anti-colonial nationalist movements in the British Empire.
