<em>The Sibley Commission was formed in Georgia in response to the Supreme Court ruling of Brown vs. Board of Education. The purpose of the Sibley Committe was to ;</em>
D. Decide if desegregation was constitutional in Georgia
<u>The Brown vs. Board of Education is the Court that would declare state laws establishing separate public schools for black and white students to be unconstitutional. </u>
<u>This was my original thought that the answer would be, however, The Sibley Commission was created to survey on whether or not to integrate schools. Which leaves me thinking the answer might most likely be answer choice A as well.</u>
A. Determine if Georgians wanted to integrate schools
<u>Georgians would rather see schools closed that integrated. These lawsuits were combined into the landmark Brown v. Board of Education Supreme Court case that outlawed segregation in schools. </u>
Answer choice A seems about correct.
Answer:
It is known as pluralistic ignorance.
Explanation:
Pluralistic ignorance occurs in social situations when an individual does not feel free to express their opinion and makes a wrong inference of what their peers think, so they end up accepting the option they believe the group would choose, even if they disagree.
An example would be: Karla is on the bus, and a person sits next to her, she watches the woman and thinks that looks like a kind person and would like to talk with her for a while, but nobody talks with other people on the bus so avoid talking to her.
The spectator effect is an example of pluralistic ignorance; when an emergency occurs, the larger the group that observed the emergency situation, the less likely someone will help. The individual in the group may think that it would not be right to help, or that he/she should not help because surely another person would help.
<em>I hope this information can help you.</em>
They used it to control their government.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter A. My friend, Greg, likes to bake cookies for the people in the office.
Explanation:
What we have in this sentence is an appositive, a word or phrase immediately following and renaming another word or phase. Our appositive here is "Greg", which is renaming the noun "friend". Since "Greg" is only giving additional but not essential information, it could easily be removed from the sentence. Notice how the sentence would still make sense: " My friend likes to bake cookies for the people in the office." Since this appositive is not a restrictive one, it should be framed by commas. That is why the best option is letter A.
The correct theory for scenario A is Cognitive Learning theory.
The correct theory for scenario B is Behavioral Learning theory.
The correct theory for scenario C is Social Learning theory.
Cognitive learning theory focuses on the mental thoughts that go through an individual's mind and how they are affected by both internal and external factors. The one-year-old child has fear ingrained in his mind even after some days have passed because of his external experiences.
Behavioral learning theory is based on the idea that people learn through interaction with their environments. Positive and Negative reinforcements play additional roles for they can motivate or water down a person's desire to continue a particular act. We see this learning theory in the second scenario where the husband positively reinforces his wife's act by taking her out. This will motivate the woman to repeat the act.
The Social learning theory proposed by Albert Bandura is based on the fact that people tend to learn by observing the behaviors, attitudes, and emotional responses of others. In the third scenario, all the kids in the line started crying because they learned through observation that the needle was painful.
Conclusively, cognitive, behavioral, and social learning theories apply to scenarios A, B, and C respectively.
Learn more about the learning theories here:
brainly.com/question/20925955
