Answer:
Qualified Health Claim
Explanation:
A Qualified Health Claim is a claim that is permitted by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) which is supported by scientific evidence as regards a food substance and its relationship to a disease. 
A qualified health claim is usually based on few evidences compared to authorized health claim. For example, when a new or emerging evidence of a food in relation to its ability to reduce the risk of a particular disease is found, but not concrete enough for the FDA to approve an Authorized Heath claim, the FDA then issues a Qualified Health Claim.
Therefore, in the case of selenium, the FDA approved a Qualified Health Claim.
 
        
             
        
        
        
not sure if this helps but I hope it does
sorry its so long
To date erosion scientists have failed to address — or have addressed inadequately — some of the ‘big questions’ of our discipline. For example, where is erosion occurring? Why is it happening, and who is to blame? How serious is it? Who does it affect? What should be the response? Can we prevent it? What are the costs of erosion? Our inability or reluctance to answer such questions damages our credibility and is based on weaknesses in commonly-used approaches and the spatial and temporal scales at which much research is carried out. We have difficulty in the recognition, description and quantification of erosion, and limited information on the magnitude and frequency of events that cause erosion. In particular there has been a neglect of extreme events which are known to contribute substantially to total erosion. The inadequacy and frequent misuse of existing data leaves us open to the charge of exaggeration of the erosion problem (a la Lomborg).
Models need to be developed for many purposes and at many scales. Existing models have proved to be of limited value, in the real as opposed to the academic world, both because of problems with the reliability of their results, and difficulties (with associated costs) of acquiring suitable data. However, there are some positive signs: models are now being developed for purposes including addressing questions of off-site impacts and land-use policy. Cheap, reliable and technically simple methods of erosion assessment at the field scale are needed. At the global scale, an up-date of GLASOD based on a scientific approach is urgent so that we are at least able to identify erosion ‘hotspots’.
In terms of explanation of erosion, the greatest need is for a full recognition of the importance of socio-economic drivers. The accession of new countries to the EU with different economic and land-use histories emphasises this need. Too often we have left people, especially the farmers, out of the picture. Our approach could be characterised as ‘data-rich and people-poor’.
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
The main aims of the organisation included disarmament, preventing war through collective security, settling disputes between countries through negotiation and diplomacy, and improving global welfare. The League lacked an armed force of its own to enforce any actions to achieve these aims.
Explanation:
hope it helps
 
        
                    
             
        
        
        
God promising abraham is first, the roman empire forces the jews to leave is second, third is Arabs conquering the land, the holocaust is fourth, fifth is the UN dividing land, its a tie of establishment of the current state of Israel and conflict between jews and palestinians for sixth, seven is Zionism starts in europe and last but not least the Arab-Israel war. sorry it took so long. hope this helps!
= ̄ω ̄=