Answer:
The boycott would have cut off their transportation to and from work. As well as anywhere they could not get to on foot. Leading to possible job losses and in turn losing the ability to pay for their homes and food.
Below are the differences between Bentham’s and Mill’s respective versions of utilitarianism:
1. The qualitative distinction
Bentham pots concede to any distinction in propensities yet
Mill arranged human inclinations and by ethical news of subjective contrast
called some honorable and another base. Along these lines, it is said that
scholarly propensities are far better than physiological inclinations.
2. Qualitative distinction in pleasures:
Similarly, Mill made subjective refinements in various joys. As indicated
by Bentham, all delights are comparable. In the event that the amount of joy is
the same, at that point, there is no distinction amongst verse and pushpin. As
opposed to this, as indicated by Mill, 'It is ideal to be a person disappointed
than a pig fulfilled, better to be a Socrates disappointed than a trick
fulfilled.
Answer:
B). The United States will eventually destroy American Indians.
Explanation:
In the context of the given quotation, the conclusion that can be made about Tecumseh's thought would be regarding <u>'the United States plan to gradually ruin American Indians</u>.' It <u>reveals that he wanted the American Indian tribes to resist in order to persuade them to transfer the land to the Americans which he believed could only be done by making them agree</u>. Thus, <u>option B</u> is the correct answer.
Answer:
The Correct answer is B.
Explanation:
By leading americans to view communist beliefs as dangerous to the US
Industries or saltis hat i know hope it help you
