I think Its C because in the frequency table or table given if the heads are counted there are 6 of them and over all 10 which will make 6/10
<h3>
Answer: Choice B</h3>
No, this is not a plausible value for the population mean, because 5 is not within the 95% confidence interval.
====================================================
Explanation:
The greek letter mu is the population mean. It has the symbol
which looks like the letter 'u' but with a tail at the front or left side.
The question is asking if mu = 5 is plausible if the researcher found the 95% confidence interval to be 5.2 < mu < 7.8
We see that 5 is <u>not</u> in that interval. It's a bit to the left of 5.2
Since mu = 5 is not in the interval, it's not a plausible value for the population mean.
Have we ruled it out with 100% confidence? No. Such a thing is not possible. There's always room for (slight) error. The researcher would need to do a census to be fully confident; however, such practices are very time consuming and expensive. This is the main reason why statistics is important to try to estimate the population with a sample.
The answer would be 5547
First you multiply 5417 and 2.4% to get 130.008
Then you add 130.008 and 5417 to get 5547.008
but you can round this to 5547
Hope this helped! :)
No. Solve each of the problems and see if they match. Do PEMDAS order of operations