Explanation:
Let’s explore one by one as proposed:
An oil cartel raises oil prices: all prices in the oil-related products will increase making it more expensive for companies to be able to afford employees. As the US economy is heavily based on oil import and consumption, the unemployment rate (let´s call it UR from now on) would increase. Countries that export more than import could benefit from this scenario.
The U.S. dollar gains value against foreign currencies: It would be more expensive to produce goods in the US as its currency becomes stronger. Hence companies could choose to produce overseas, increasing the UR. One of the factors that attract investments is a cheap currency, meaning that a company could operate there at lower costs than anywhere else.
American consumers expect higher income in the future: As fights about average salary would arise between employees and companies, igniting even sindicalization, its proper to think that the same as above could occur; companies could choose to produce overseas in countries less demanding of labor rights and income, such as China provinces (I would recommend for you to watch American Factory, a awarded Netflix documentary about that subject).
Brazil experiences economic growth and increases its demand for U.S. exports: as I said in the first alternative, a country that has increased or more expensive exports could benefit from that creating more jobs, in this case decreasing the UR. If Brazil demands more US products, more has to be produced by the country, which would mean more people employed in this attractive sector.
U.S. real estate values rise: to be honest, it only affects indirectly. As housing becomes more expensive, people have to work more to be able to afford housing. That would mean they seeking better-paying jobs or in the absence of those being homeless of at least unable to buy a home. We could argue that the UR would decrease because it becomes more expensive to afford housing and hence people would migrate more but that’s a long shot rationale.
Answer:
Sheridan Company
Income Statement
For the year ended December 31, 202x
Sales revenue $170,400
Cost of goods sold <u>($129,600)</u>
Gross profit $40,800
Period costs <u>($24,000)</u>
Operating income $16,800
cost of goods manufactured 2019 (or 2020, it is the same)= (20 x $4,500) + $18,000 = $108,000 / 20 = $5,400 per unit
COGS 2020 = 24 x $5,400 = $129,600
sales revenue = 24 x $7,100 = $170,400
Answer:
A. The Equity Investment account balance will equal 30% of investee's stockholders' equity at date of acquisition, plus the unamortized cost of the patent.
Answer:
Joint Tenancy
Explanation:
Joint tenancy represents a legal contractual arrangement that involves two or more people who have agreed to own a single property sharing both obligations and rights equally.
The terms of join tenancy is such that no one whether the partner or an inheritor of will is able to sell the property in future without the consent of other partners. Secondly, when a partner dies joint tenancy does not transfer assets to heirs instead it is vested in the surviving partner.
It becomes that Bill did not name his wife as his beneficiary, hence Mike inherits the entire 342 acres of land after Bill's death.
It is a technical database managerial role that it performs in an organization. The DBA has detailed function and a critical role in maintaining database security, organization, management, performance, recovery, and marketing. This requires analysis and systematic view of all said functions.
