Prepare a dialogue on the topic Possibitics of Rural Tourism in Nepal "

All of the following are true regarding implied agreements EXCEPT which one?

Brrunno [24]

Answer:

An implied agreement is based on a formal agreement.

Explanation:

A contract can be defined as an agreement between two or more parties (group of people) which gives rise to a mutual legal obligation or enforceable by law.

There are different types of contract in business and these includes: fixed-price contract, cost-plus contract, bilateral contract, implied contract, unilateral contract, adhesion contract, unconscionable contract, option contract, express contract, executory contract, etc.

Mutual assent is a legal term which represents an agreement by both parties to a contract. When two parties to a contract both have an understanding of the parameters, terms and conditions surrounding a contract, it ultimately implies that they are in agreement; this is generally referred to as mutual assent.

Simply stated, mutual assent connotes agreement, acceptance and consent to a contract by both parties.

An implied contract can be defined as an informal contract that exists based on an assumption or understanding between two or more parties, rather than on terms that are formally and specifically defined.

This ultimately implies that, an implied agreement is not based on a formal agreement but on assumptions or understanding between the parties involved.

4 0

2 years ago

Senator Brown wants to increase taxes on people with high incomes and use the money to help the poor. Senator Johnson argues tha

Sergeeva-Olga [200]

Answer:

a good decision requires that we recognize both viewpoints

Explanation:

Based on this information it can be said that an economist would most likely state that a good decision requires that we recognize both viewpoints. That is because every decision will affect everyone, but some individuals will be affected positively while others will be affected negatively. Therefore trying to recognize the viewpoint of both sides will allow for decisions that are as fair as possible to both sides.

6 0

3 years ago

The Mateo Corporationâs inventory at December 31, 2018, was $325,000 based on a physical count priced at cost, and before any ne

Oliga [24]

Answer:

The correct answer to the following question is $405,000 .

Explanation:

Given information -

Mateo corporations inventory on 31, December 2018 - $325,000

Merchandise costing , shipped from a vendor on December 30, but was received on January 5, 2019 - $30,000

Merchandise costing, destination from a vendor on December 28, 2018, but was received on January 3, 2019 - $22,000 .

Merchandise costing, shipped to a customer on December 28, arrived at customers location on January 6, 2019 - $38,000

Merchandise costing, held on consignment by Traynor company - $12,000

Mateo corporations inventory as on 31 December 2018 -

$325,000 + $30,000 + $38,000 + $12,000

= $405,000

4 0

3 years ago

Consider the metaphor used in the article differentiating managerial and leadership roles (average managers play checkers, great

Jobisdone [24]

Answer:

Following are the solution to this question:

Explanation:

The metaphor of gambling, chess, and rallying related only to the degree of growing complexity and significance of different roles. In typical management needs and allocates capital, so named players. A senior executive not just uses the resource and also serves as a key motivator for both the company's so-called chess-making goals. Its successful leaders, however, not just to lead to accomplishing organizational targets, and also motivate individuals to serve a better future, and people are advised to rally to the metaphor is therefore said to have been accurate and is focused on the various positions and levels performed by the organization, thus distinguishing roles.

5 0

3 years ago

Scott and his partner, Greg, have decided to update their computer network, although they have no expertise in this area. During

jarptica [38.1K]

Answer:

The correct answer is rational decision making.

Explanation:

The question about rationality is that all human beings are different, with different tastes, variety of opportunities and what is rational or useful for one person may be totally different from what would satisfy another. In addition to everyday situations, people often make quick and unconscious decisions that are part of their daily experiences and are chosen by inertia, which can often leave rationality aside to become repetitive or everyday choices, another really important aspect Within the issue of decision making is the change of thoughts, tastes or perspectives of people over time and according to their experiences or areas in which they are, in short, what for a person can be rational in this At the moment, it won't be in the future.

The above gives us a perspective of decision-making in many fields where it can be observed that the most important thing is the search for self-benefit and where opportunity costs are weighed in order to see what is most useful within the opportunities They are available. The most interesting of all is to understand that we live with economic science on a daily basis and that without a doubt it is immersed in us when making decisions; It is also called "The hidden logic of life."

4 0

3 years ago

Prepare a dialogue on the topic Possibitics of Rural Tourism in Nepal "​

Prepare a dialogue on the topic Possibitics of Rural Tourism in Nepal "