Ehrlich, S. (1997). Gender as social practice: Implications for second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 421-446.
<h3>Gender as social practice: Implications for second language acquisition?</h3>
A refereed publication with a global reach, Studies in Second Language Acquisition is devoted to the scientific topic of learning or using heritage and non-native languages. In addition to essays on current theoretical topics, each volume's four issues contain research pieces that are either quantitative or qualitative in nature. Replication Studies, Critical Commentaries, and Research Reports are examples of shorter publications that fall under other rubrics.
Ehrlich, S. (1997). Gender as social practice: Implications for second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 421-446. This essay analyzes recent work on language and gender and discusses how it relates to gender-based studies of second language learning. Recent work has rejected categorical and fixed ideas of social identities in favor of more constructivist and dynamic ones. This is true of sociolinguistics in general and language and gender study in particular.
Learn more about Second Language Acquisition here:
brainly.com/question/11412810
#SPJ4
Answer:
100 Senators, 435 Representatives, 5 Delegates, and 1 Resident Commissioner
Explanation:
Answer:
C) control
Explanation:
The control group can be explained as the group in an experiment or study that does not receive treatment by the researchers and is then used as a benchmark to measure how the other tested subjects do.
This group is used in an experiment or research as a way to ensure or know that your experiment actually works. In other words, it is used in an experiment to establish its validity.
In this case, the participants that were told to solve the problems alone, were in the control group. And they were used to establish the validity of the study.
Answer:
d) perceived control
Explanation:
Employees are who are permitted to personalize their work space are likely to be more productive, committed, motivated workers, because the personalization process increases workers' <u>perceived control</u>. Employees who personalize their work space have a perceived control of their work environment and hence feel more at home in their work thus leading to increased productivity.
