Answer:
It can veto laws passed by the legislative branch.
Explanation:
The ability to veto a certain law is held by the President of United States (the president is part of the executive branch)
Whenever the legislative branch created a law that does not have at least 67% of the legislators, the president had the ability to veto it. When the law is vetoed, the law wouldn't be able to be enacted into law unless the legislators made some change/adjustment that the president asked for.
Answer:
The Constitution explicitly assigns the president the power to sign or veto legislation, command the armed forces, ask for the written opinion of their Cabinet, convene or adjourn Congress, grant reprieves and pardons, and receive ambassadors.
Answer:
Among the options here, this is the answer:
C. Germany printed more paper money to pay wartime reparations,
which led to hyperinflation.
Explanation:
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached, we can say the following.
According to Jody Freeman, some of the reasons why the federal government should intervene with national standards to regulate fracking, are the following.
She, as the expert on environmental issues she is, says that the federal government is better equipped to regulate the use of fracking in the United States. The main argument is that fracking is a controversial practice to extract oil and gas because it damages the environment. The states are not in a position to better manage this issue, alone. She considers that the risks of fracking can go beyond state limits and could become a national interest.
Jody Freeman is a renowned professor of Harvard School of Law that specializes in environmental law.
