Answer:
The use of the term "ethical" sometimes is a bit too lax when applied to evaluate situations. However, sometimes, it can also be too harsh. In response to your two questions, these would be the answers:
1. The ethical question here would be whether Greedy was right in overusing a benefit that the charitable organization had with the First California Bank. As President of the organization, it is in the hands of Greedy to ensure not just development, but also sustainable development of the organization. However, in the course of his attempts to improve the growth and efficacy of Send Me Money, he abused the benefit of the overdraft, and not to just any extent, but to the negative balance of 10.000 dollars. Although his intentions were in favor of the organization, and he used the money wisely, there still lies the question of if he could not have accomplished just as much, without abusing a benefit that could very well mean the end of the organization. So the ethical issue is that although the intention of Greedy was in the benefit of the organization, he did not take the best interest of it into account, because if he had, he would have tried to accomplish his goals without bringing the debt so high.
2. I disapprove of the way that Bill Greedy acted because he could have accomplished much more realistic goals and not placed the organization at risk by raising the debt to a bank to such high levels. Even if he increased fundraising efforts, it is evident that these were not successful, as the debt is so high.
The Figurative Slave act and the <span>Compromise of 1850 determined the outcome of the presidential election of 1852.
Hope this helps!!</span>
The statement given by Robert Sternberg which suggests that the intelligence is culturally defined is TRUE. Intelligence quotient of individuals also changes with change in regions.
Intelligence is in the culture and customs followed by an individuals or group of individuals in a way that how the ancestors or super senior people have impacted the way of living.
<h3>Intelligence</h3>
- The intelligence of a person cannot be defined in exact numbers but is grouped from a range of being less intelligent to being very intelligent, and it cannot be seen but can be felt and experienced.
- Intelligence differs with changing cultures, which is dependent on factors like the upbringing of such person belonging to a specific culture and the teachings of life left behind by the ancestors.
- The individuals belonging to a culture have different intelligence because of the customs and traditions that have been set as standard practices and followed from such period.
Hence, the statement given above by Robert Sternberg which suggests that the intelligence is culturally defined is TRUE.
To know more about intelligence, click the link below.
brainly.com/question/9944825
Charter Colony (so called because the document given to the company by the English King was called a charter)
