1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Vlad1618 [11]
3 years ago
13

Which statement is true? A. The allied powers followed Wilson’s fourteen points. B. Germany was forced to pay the allied powers

and accept blame for the war. C. Although the armistice took place on November 11, 1918, fighting continues on the western front. D. Germany preferred to keep fighting rather than accept the terms for peace
History
2 answers:
____ [38]3 years ago
7 0

Answer is B. Germany was forced to pay the Allied Powers and accept blame for the war.

In the War Guilt Clause (Article 231 of the Treaty of Versailles) it was stated that Germany had the responsibility of beginning WWI. This clause was added to achieve an agreement between France and Belgium so that the monetary sum the Germans would have to pay in compensation for the damage caused was reduced.

This clause was seen as a grant from the negotiators to the Germans. However, it caused a general resentment on the part of German people, since they did not accept the responsibility for the outbreak of the war.


posledela3 years ago
5 0

Germany was forced to pay the Allied Powers and accept blame for the war (APEX Class ;)

You might be interested in
What was the “brain trust”?]
spin [16.1K]
A group of appointed experts to advise governments/ politicians.
4 0
3 years ago
What are some positive effects on colonialism in africa
Softa [21]
Created more African Jobs
Brought America closer to the world.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Jamestown colony location?
klio [65]

Answer:

Nonetheless, studies have shown that there were aspects of slave culture that differed from the master culture. Some of these have been interpreted as a form of resistance to oppression, while other aspects were clearly survivals of a native culture in the new society. Most of what is known about this topic comes from the circum-Caribbean world, but analogous developments may have occurred wherever alien slaves were concentrated in numbers sufficient to prevent their complete absorption by the host slave-owning or slave society. Thus slave culture was probably very different on large plantations from what it was on small farms or in urban households, where slave culture (and especially Creole slave culture) could hardly have avoided being very similar to the master culture. Slave cultures grew up within the perimeters of the masters’ monopoly of power but separate from the masters’ institutions.

Religion, which performed the multiple function of explanation, prediction, control, and communion, seems to have been a particularly fruitful area for the creation of slave culture. Africans perceived all misfortunes, including enslavement, as the result of sorcery, and their religious practices and beliefs, which were often millennial, were formulated as a way of coping with it. Myalism was the first religious movement to appeal to all ethnic groups in Jamaica, Vodou in Haiti was the product of African culture slightly refashioned on that island, and syncretic Afro-Christian religions and rituals appeared nearly everywhere throughout the New World. Slave religions usually had a supreme being and a host of lesser spirits brought from Africa, borrowed from the Amerindians, and created in response to local conditions. There were no firm boundaries between the secular and the sacred, which infused all things and activities. At least initially African slaves universally believed that posthumously they would return to their lands and rejoin their friends.

Black slaves preserved some of their culture in the New World. African medicine was practiced in America by slaves. The poisoning of masters and other hated individuals was a particularly African method of coping with evil.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Please help mee hurry
Y_Kistochka [10]
The first answer is the right one
6 0
2 years ago
How did the civil war test the foundation of a country that uses democracy?
Vika [28.1K]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Although there are no options attached we can say the following.

The civil war tested the foundation of a country that uses democracy in that the civil war confronts people from the same country on the battlefield for political and economic reasons.

It is hard to believe that people from the same nationality -brothers we could say in a metaphorical way- confront each other to the extreme of seceding from the Union and fight using weapons. A civil war is an internal battle that hurts democracy and the legitimacy of the government that the founding fathers so carefully planned for the United States since colonial American times.

A civil war separates, divides. As President Abraham Lincoln said in his famous speech "A House divided," if a country is divided from within, this not only hurts democracy and freedom but also impacts all aspects and foundations of a nation.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • 5. What were the causes and effects of the Reign of Terror
    13·1 answer
  • What was the result of The Spanish Civil War?
    13·2 answers
  • The border between East and West Germany is one representation of
    11·1 answer
  • Why is the ability to build a consensus an important skill for a leader?
    6·1 answer
  • In an autocracy, what kind of power does the leader hold?
    9·1 answer
  • According to freud, the ego is guided by the ,whereas the id is guided by the
    14·1 answer
  • How were the Great Awakening and the Enlightenment different?
    10·1 answer
  • How many confederates died in the civil war
    7·1 answer
  • 1)
    13·1 answer
  • Is it true that the writing of the Constitution, the North and South had been compromising on the issue of slavery?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!