1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
pentagon [3]
2 years ago
7

Drawing Inferences What does Ross feel about the treaty?

History
2 answers:
eduard2 years ago
5 0

Answer:.... ... ... .... ..

d

Oliga [24]2 years ago
4 0
The answer for the question is B. He believes it was non negotiable by true representatives of his people.
You might be interested in
Differentiate between the goals and limits of the fiscal policy
Zepler [3.9K]

Limits of fiscal policy include difficulty of changing spending levels, predicting the future, delayed results, political pressures, and coordinating fiscal policy.


3 0
3 years ago
After the Reformation began what happened to England
MA_775_DIABLO [31]

it started losing money

5 0
3 years ago
The factors that led to the Great Compromise, including the two competing plans that came before it
solniwko [45]

Answer:

The main issue that led to the Great Compromise was the issue of representation. The small states in the country thought that every state should have equal representation in the Congress. They thought the states ought to be equal to one another.

Explanation:

i think this is it tell me if its not !

8 0
2 years ago
Casualties at the Battle of Okinawa and Iwo Jima
Agata [3.3K]

Casualty rates at the Battle of Okinawa and Iwo Jima plays a small role in the justification of dropping the atomic bomb, and is by no means the only justification or even the major justification in using the atomic bomb. They were, after all, only used as a statistical report through the casualty per sq. mile report of what can occur when invading the mainland. So yes, it may be a  means towards the justification, but as the justification itself it is not.

~

3 0
2 years ago
What did the Glass-Steagall Act of 1933 and the Federal Securities Act have in common?
zalisa [80]

The Glass-Steagall Act of 1933 and the Federal Securities Act have in common is "they both regulated banking and finance".

<u>Answer:</u> Option A

<u>Explanation:</u>

The Glass Steagall Acts formally separated banking made on commercial from investment type. On June 16, 1933, it founded the Federal Deposits Insurance Corporations. It was one in the most discussed policies before President Franklin D. legally signed it.

The Federal Deposits Insurance Corporations was also proposed by banking acts, 1933. The Banking Act was the first federal law regulating the stock market. It has bank deposits insurance and supports to prevent a new recession. Glass-Steagall has helped reduce costs to ensure government security.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why was public health a major concern in large cities during the 1880s?
    6·2 answers
  • What actions did the First and Second Continental Congress take in setting up a new government?
    12·1 answer
  • What did east pakistan change its name to in 1971??
    11·2 answers
  • Why is the astm important to the united states?
    13·2 answers
  • How did the presence of the border states illustrate a difference between the Union and Confederacy?
    11·2 answers
  • pope Julius II commissioned Donato Bramante to design which structure in Rome that had been demolished because of deterioration?
    9·2 answers
  • Why did the US want Industry?
    8·2 answers
  • How did Rizal envision the pre-colonial Filipinos? Why?
    12·1 answer
  • Question 7(Multiple Choice Worth 5 points)
    14·2 answers
  • 1. How has baseball changed since the 1800s?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!