La respuesta correcta para esta pregunta abierta es la siguiente.
A pesar de que no hay opciones, podemos comentar esto.
Una fuente histórica se analiza de diversas maneras. Una de ella es por medio del autor. Hay que revisar quién es el autor, cómo recolectó la información, cuáles fueron sus fuentes. Si él mismo atestiguó el acontecimiento al que se refiere.
Otra forma puede ser si él entrevistó a personas que estuvieron presentes y vieron el acontecimiento que describe.
También hay que analizar qué tipo de documentos aporta para comprobar lo que se dice. Pueden ser pergaminos, cartas, fotografías, o más recientemente, videos y audios.
Otra manera es validar lo que la fuente dice, comparándola con otras fuentes que digan algo similar para corroborar la información original.
Every year, the Federal Reserve conducts a massive survey of American households to paint a portrait of their economic habits and spirits. The recently published findings for 2017 are worth examining for what they say about who should — and shouldn't — get credit for the resilient U.S. economy.
There is nothing unusual about this. When the economy does well, presidents of both parties routinely brag about the results. Trump did just that last week with the latest jobs report. But as I — and many other commentators — have written, the $20 trillion economy is simply too big and complicated to be easily manipulated for partisan advantage.
The realist painters didnt accept Romanticism, which had come to dominate French literature, with roots in the late century. The characters were portrayed in their own setting which shaped their actions and their choices .
So he can bring the country out of depression.
Answer: A. The abolitionist movement grew stronger.
<em>Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857)</em> was a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court. It held that black people whose ancestors were imported into the U.S., whether enslaved of free, could not be American citizens. Therefore, they could not sue in federal court. Moreover, it ruled that the federal government had no power to regulate slavery in the territories acquired after the creation of the United States.
The decision was controversial, and greatly opposed by abolitionist groups. It strengthened the abolitionist movement and may have been a catalyst for the American Civil War.
