Answer:
The uniform of Air force represents dignity and pride. The uniform should be worn with care because public see them as a country representative of Airforce. They do not see them as one individual. The uniform sets a military image of a country in the eyes of the entire world. It is necessary that the uniform is appropriately designed so that it represents a nation self confidence.
Explanation:
The uniforms of Air force are important to set a reputation in the world. The uniform worn by the Airmen reminds him about the dignity and pride of his nation. He has the responsibility to wear uniform with care to correctly represent his commitment towards his nation. This will bring self confidence in the Airmen and he will e able to serve his nation better.
Statistically, yes. Friday and the weekend is when most people go out to have fun. Some people may get drunk or get under the influence of drugs, then get behind a wheel. That will increase the chance in being in a car crash.
Eleven of the thirteen federal appellate courts cover specific geographic regions and circuits.
A federal monarchy, within the strict sense, is a federation of states with a single monarch as general head of the federation, however keeping different monarchs, or having a non-monarchical machine of government, in the diverse states joined to the federation. The term changed into introduced into English political and historic discourse by Edward Augustus Freeman, in his records of Federal government (1863). Freeman himself concept a federal monarchy only possible in the summary. historically, the maximum outstanding instance of a federal monarchy in the Western international become the German Empire (1871–1918) and, to a lesser volume, its predecessors.
Learn more about federal here
brainly.com/question/220248
#SPJ4
Answer:
When Bill Clinton signed the 1993 Motor Voter bill, mandating states to offer on- the-spot voter registration at various government agencies, Republicans in California and several other states sought to undermine the new law by withholding critical funding and, later, by seeking court injunctions against its implementation. Although these officials justified their actions by warning that Motor Voter would increase voter fraud, partisan concerns may have been on their minds. Since nonvoters tend to be poorer than voters, many conservatives feared--just as many liberals hoped--that Motor Voter would produce a Democratic bonanza at the polls.These attempts to subvert the National Voter Registration Act, as Motor Voter is officially known, have failed in most cases. Although several states still lag behind in implementation, today most Americans can register to vote by mail or when they conduct the most routine government business, from applying for a driver's license to receiving public assistance. In addition, by shifting the responsibility for maintaining eligible voter lists from individuals, parties, and campaigns to the states, Motor Voter removes barriers to voting imposed 100 years ago--barriers that con tributed significantly to the low levels of twentieth-century U.S. voter turnout and unrepresentativeness of the electorate. No matter what the electoral impact today, this achievement brings us closer to the norm of universal voter registration typical of other industrial democracies. But those who believe that Motor Voter will on its own increase turnout significantly are mistaken, as are those who anticipate an automatic windfall for the Democratic Party. While the law removes significant obstacles to participation, the precipitous decline in turnout since the 1960s reflects a growing indifference to politics, not a lack of access to the voting booth. In the short term at least, Motor Voter will make the biggest dif ference to otherwise motivated citizens for whom registration is a significant obstacle to voting: those who are under 30 or who move frequently, not the poor. The former two groups' partisan orientation does not differ substantially from that of the electorate as a whole. What's more, these new voters will have a disproportionate impact in states where Democrats already struggle--states like Florida, Georgia, and Arkansas, all of which have long histories of restrictive registration laws.
Explanation: