I’m assuming ‘dives further’ means to go directly down
the angle of elevation of the ship from the submarine is equal to the angle of depression of the submarine from the ship, if we assume the sea level is perpendicular to ‘directly down’.
let both of these angles to be = $ when the submarine is at A and ¥ when the submarine is at B (excuse the lack of easily accessible variables as keys)
then this become a simple trig problem:
A)
Let O be the position of of the ship, and C be the original position of the submarine.
therefore, not considering direction
|OC| = 1.78km = 1780m
|CA| = 45m
these are the adjacent and opposite sides of a right angled triangle.
But tan($) = opp/adj = |CA|/|OC| = 45/1780
therefore $ = arctan(45/1780) which is roughly 1.45 degrees,
B)
similarly, noting that |CB| = |CA| + |AB| = 45 + 62 = 107m
tan(¥) = 107/1780
¥ = arctan(107/1780) which is roughly 3.44 degrees
Answer:
$245
Step-by-step explanation:
350× 0.30 = 105 dollars off
350-105 = 245
Answer:
We want to find:
Here we can use Stirling's approximation, which says that for large values of n, we get:
Because here we are taking the limit when n tends to infinity, we can use this approximation.
Then we get.
Now we can just simplify this, so we get:
And we can rewrite it as:
The important part here is the exponent, as n tends to infinite, the exponent tends to zero.
Thus:
Answer:
1) 180 is a straight line, so 180 - 118 = <em>62</em>
2) 180 degrees are in a triangle, so 180 - (62) - 73 = <em>45</em>
3) 180 is a straight line, so 180 - 73 = 107. There are 180 degrees in a triangle, so 180 - 49 - 45 = <em>86</em>
La opinión correcta es la de Camila que argumenta que la frecuencia relativa de la cara con el #6 será un valor cercano a 0,166.
<h3>Qué es la frecuencia relativa?</h3>
La frecuencia relativa es un término matemático que se utiliza en la estadística para referirse al número de veces que un evento se repite durante un experimento.
Por otra parte, es necesario aclara que la frecuencia relativa no se modifica en gran medida si se aumenta el número de veces de una prueba, debido a que la probabilidad de ocurrencia de este evento va a ser la misma.
De acuerdo a lo anterior, Camila tiene razón debido a que considera que el valor de la frecuencia relativa no se modifica en gran medida entre 300 o 600 lanzamientos de los dados.
Nota: Esta pregunta está incompleta porque no está la tabla. No obstante, la puedo responder basado en mi conocimiento previo.
Aprenda más sobre probabilidad en: brainly.com/question/16019390