Physical Trauma
Loud noise
Loss of a loved one
Answer:
Here is the complete question with options: Abbey Company completed the annual count of its inventory. During the count, certain items were identified as requiring special attention. Decide how each item would be handled for Abbey Company's inventory.
item#1: Goods in transit shipped to Abbey(Purchaser) FOB destination:
item#2: Goods in transit shipped to Abbey(purchaser) FOB shipping point.
item#3: Goods in transit shipped by Abbey(seller) FOB destination.
item#4: Goods in transit shipped by Abbey(seller) shipping point.
Now, checking how these items are handled by Abbey company´s inventory.
item#1: Goods in transit shipped to Abbey(purchaser) FOB destination: Excluded from inventory as goods has not arrived to the buyer´s place, therefore, ownership will not be transferred.
item#2: Goods in transit shipped to Abbey FOB (purchaser) shipping point: Included in inventory as goods are shipped to shipping point, so ownership will be transferred if carrier accept the goods from the seller.
item#3: Goods in transit shipped by Abbey FOB(seller) destination: Included in the inventory as Abbey owns the goods while goods is in transit.
item#4: Goods in transit shipped by Abbey(seller) shipping point: Excluded from inventory as a seller, Ownership has been transferred from Abbey.
Answer: An iteration can be used instead of many repetitive lines of code in a computer program
Explanation: An iteration in computer programming parlance refers to a process whereby a computer is programmed to execute a specific task repeatedly or in a repetitive manner according to a given set of instructions. When a particular instruction is executed more than once without having to explicitly state the instructions for the computer again before it's execution, this process is called iteration. Whereby a repetitive action is performed without having to repeatedly write out the instruction set or program code again. Iterative actions may be performed in programming using the FOR or WHILE loop statement.
Answer:
The answer is: NO OPTION IS COMPLETE
Explanation:
Option A is totally wrong (the product should have been defective), but options B through F are incomplete.
They should have been:
B) The defendant must normally be engaged in the <u>business of selling</u> (or otherwise distributing) that product.
C) The product must be <u>unreasonably dangerous</u> to the user or consumer because of its defective condition (in most states).
D) The plaintiff must incur <u>physical harm</u> to self or property by use or consumption of the product.
E) The defective condition must be the <u>proximate cause</u> of the injury or damage.
F) The goods must not have been <u>substantially changed</u> from the time the product was sold to the time the injury was sustained.
“Price insensitive” would be the closest answer
