The Dust Bowl, also known as the Dirty Thirties, was a period of severe dust storms that greatly damaged the ecology and agriculture of the US and Canadian prairies during the 1930s; severe drought and a failure to apply dryland farming methods to prevent wind erosion (the Aeolian processes) caused the phenomenon.
It is in asia near India and China.
It untwgnwfnagnagngagnsgmzggmzv zv vG zv zv San V vnggmaanf gamgG.MganfafnaafnafnfnNfNfaafnnafafnfnafanafnafnafnsed to bagnatnzv vzvnCcnDbafnafnafnsggmsgnsgnFnafnatnfnatjfabD
The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "D. The painting on the left illustrates secular themes characteristic of the medieval era, while the painting on the right illustrates religious themes characteristic of the Renaissance."
Answer:
No, the Crusades weren’t justifiable. The Arab/Muslim conquest of the region centuries earlier wasn’t justifiable either. There were no good guys or bad guys in that conflict. Both sides were wrong.
From the perspective of Jews and Samaritans, it was really just two colonial powers (Crusaders and Arabs) fighting over a land that never rightfully belonged to either of them in the first place.
Explanation:
What is important today is to understand that the unjustified reaction of the Christian community to actions in the Holy Land can be compared to the reaction of people in the Muslim world to Western dominance. So, instead of something like the Crusades was seen as an acceptance by many Muslims of terrorism. If the Christian Crusades were bad, so is the Muslim acceptance for decades of terrorism, particularly towards Israeli civilians.
